1994
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.163.5.7976869
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Emphysema: definition, imaging, and quantification.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
160
0
7

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 264 publications
(170 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
160
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…High-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) is currently the most sensitive imaging method available for detecting structural pulmonary changes caused by emphysema (1,2), and it has become the method of choice for studying asbestos-induced pulmonary and pleural diseases (3). HRCT is also the most effective method for diagnosing asbestosis and emphysema, and it is superior to pulmonary function tests and chest X-rays for that purpose (4,5).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) is currently the most sensitive imaging method available for detecting structural pulmonary changes caused by emphysema (1,2), and it has become the method of choice for studying asbestos-induced pulmonary and pleural diseases (3). HRCT is also the most effective method for diagnosing asbestosis and emphysema, and it is superior to pulmonary function tests and chest X-rays for that purpose (4,5).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using CT images, the severity of emphysema was scored on a nonparametric scale from 0 (no emphysema) to 100 by the panel grading (PG) method of Thurlbeck et al [3]. This consists of 16 inflation-fixed, paper-mounted, midsagittal whole lung sections that are arranged at intervals of 5 between 0 and 50, and at intervals of 10 between 60 and 100.…”
Section: Clinical Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Computed tomography (CT) is currently the most accurate imaging technique for diagnosing emphysema in vivo [3]; different quantitative methods to assess emphysema by CT have been proposed, all of them being based on densitometric image features [4]. Extensive use of CT technique to assess emphysema seems, however, unwarranted due to the high cost and substantial radiation burden to the patient.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The widespread adoption of high-resolution scanning has put into everyone's hands the tool to identify anatomic emphysema before there are any clinical manifestations. ''Early'' disease, not necessarily all disease, can be detected on CT scans; scattered holes in the lung less than 5 mm in size are difficult or impossible to detect, but CT scanning can detect earlier disease than can be detected by airflow obstruction or changes in diffusing capacity (13). A sensitive volumetric sampling technique, called sliding thin slab, minimum (or maximum, as originally described) intensity projection, has been tested successfully in the detection of minimal emphysema but has not been adopted widely, probably because of the complexity of the extra steps involved and its failure to detect much more emphysema than thin spiral scans and because of the emphysema-simulating artifacts (14)(15)(16).…”
Section: Ctmentioning
confidence: 99%