Emphasizing Library Design, Multi-Use Facility Services, and Security to Foster a Welcoming Night Library Environment

Pearson, Chad J.

doi:10.1080/02763877.2014.930651

Cited by 4 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This can create points of conflict in areas such as entrances to the building, private studying nooks, access to various areas of the library, and public gathering places that attract large groups of students seeking to collaborate or simply relax. Pearson (2014) notes that "even with all of the attention devoted to spatial design, services designed to cater to a broad spectrum of student needs, and expanded library hours of operation, academic libraries must provide safe environments for learning and socializing" (377). The most common crime in libraries is theft, particularly of personal belongings left unattended (Sanders 2012, 207).…”

Section: Introduction and Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Library Security: Perceptions of Preparedness

Adams

Kiorpes

2021

LLM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article details the results of two parallel surveys sent to the heads of campus security and the libraries at 54 schools within the SUNY system. We undertook this study to determine the extent of collaboration between these groups and to learn where library and security staff perceptions of safety and preparedness differ. The findings indicated that most campuses have emergency response plans in place for the possibility of a high-impact violent event or a human-caused emergency. However, libraries are less likely to have dedicated emergency plans and report an inconsistent mix of physical security measures and staff safety trainings. Overall, both campus security respondents and library staff members feel safe at work and reasonably prepared for a human-caused emergency. Additionally, campus security consistently rated the libraries as safer and more prepared than the librarians rated themselves, and a gap exists in perceptions of the frequency and usefulness of collaborations between the two. Security consistently answered that they are closely involved with library trainings and safety measures, while the librarians’ responses ranged from no contact with security to praise for existing collaborations and a desire for more.

show abstract

Section: Introduction and Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%