CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Extended Abstracts 2022
DOI: 10.1145/3491101.3519848
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Empathy in Design Scale: Development and Initial Insights

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This dimension was identified as a distinct dimension different from the empathy of SERVQUAL because empathy is related to the capability and behaviour of the employee providing the service (Drouet et al. , 2022).…”
Section: Findings and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This dimension was identified as a distinct dimension different from the empathy of SERVQUAL because empathy is related to the capability and behaviour of the employee providing the service (Drouet et al. , 2022).…”
Section: Findings and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This dimension was identified as a distinct dimension different from the empathy of SERVQUAL because empathy is related to the capability and behaviour of the employee providing the service (Drouet et al, 2022). At the same time, accessibility is the ability to identify and connect with the right person or resources to get a resolution.…”
Section: Accessibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently Drouet et al 2022 [18] have developed an 18item Empathy in Design Scale to assess the empathetic tendency of designers and stakeholders toward particular groups of users along four diferent dimensions Emotional interest / Discovery, Sensitivity/ Immersion, Personal experience/ Connection, and Selfawareness/ Detachment. To ensure that design students remained aware that while the glasses could provide an experience of visual impairment they could not, and indeed should not [8], create a truly embodied experience of disability we removed the sections on Sensitivity/ Immersion and Personal experience/ Connection from our evaluation.…”
Section: Study Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The result was an 8-item questionnaire, in which participants could express their level of agreement or disagreement with each statement using a 5-point scale. In particular, question 1 to 4 assesses the potential change of "Emotional Interest/ Discovery (EI)", whereas question 5 to 8 examined the "Self-awareness/ Detachment (SA)" level [18]. The questionnaire was administered to participants at the start of the study and after they completed the experiment.…”
Section: Study Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The only consensus on empathy is there is no consensus [4,22]. Moreover, quantitative metrics of empathy in design to better explain and predict it are under-researched [4,6,37]. For this reason, we believe that there is a need to expand theories, novel assessment methods, and empirical studies to increase our understanding of empathy and support the human-centered design of technologies and services.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%