Empathy and Knowledge Projection

Nickerson, Raymond S.; Butler, Susan F.; Carlin, Michael T.

doi:10.7551/mitpress/9780262012973.003.0005

Cited by 36 publications

(13 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…En segundo lugar, el diseño y validación de una medida como la presentada aquí, representa una contribución metodológica que da cuenta del papel de la empatía en el contexto de pareja, y que se compone tanto de elementos cognoscitivos (Toma de Perspectiva y Empatía Cognoscitiva de las Emociones) como emocionales (Perturbación propia y Cuidado compasivo). Hallazgo que es congruente con lo planteado por algunos teóricos (e.g., Eisenberg, 2000;Feshbach, N. D., & Feshbach, S., 2011;Nickerson et al, 2011) y confirmado por otros al operacionalizar dicho constructo a través de instrumentos de autoinforme (e.g., Davis, 1983;Díaz-Loving et al, 1986;Hojat et al, 2002).…”

Section: Discussionunclassified

“…De esta manera, diversos autores (e.g., Díaz-Loving, González-Varela, La Rosa, & Nina-Estrella, 1985;Eisenberg, 2000;Feshbach, N. D. & Feshbach, S., 2011;Hojat et al, 2002;Nickerson et al, 2011) Díaz-Loving et al (1985) señalan que es a través de la empatía que un individuo se hace consciente de los sentimientos, pensamientos e intenciones de otro (cognición), lo cual puede llevarlo a una respuesta afectiva vicaria (emoción). De manera similar, Eisenberg (2000) define a la empatía como una respuesta emocional que procede de la comprensión del estado o situación de otra persona y es similar a lo que la otra persona está sintiendo.…”

unclassified

See 1 more Smart Citation

Empatía en el Contexto Romántico: Diseño y Validación de una Medida

Aragón

Pérez

2016

Univ Psychol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

R e S u M e nLa empatía en su naturaleza involucra una serie de nociones (Batson, 2009) cuyos énfasis van de menos a más en cuanto a dos elementos psicológicos fundamentales: la cognición y la emoción que se vinculan en uno u otro sentido, es decir, en un carácter de comprensión intelectual o imaginativa de la condición del otro sin experimentar realmente los sentimientos de esa persona (e.g., Hogan, 1969) o como una reacción emocional o simpatía en respuesta a los sentimientos o experiencias de otros (e.g., Mehrabian & Epstein, 1972). Dado el carácter inherentemente interaccional de la empatía, el contexto de la relación de pareja se vuelve sumamente interesante de explorar en virtud de ella, ya que precisamente este vínculo, incluye matices de emocionalidad y cognición muy particulares que favorecen el despliegue de dicha variable que implicará la integración de sus miembros en una lectura cognitivo-emocional característica y por tanto, determinará el grado de intimidad e inmediatez alcanzado por ellos. Ante esto, el propósito de este estudio fue diseñar y validar una medida de empatía hacia la pareja en una muestra no probabilística propositiva de 467 adultos de la Ciudad de México que contaban con una relación romántica. Los resultados muestran la obtención de cuatro factores clave en el entendimiento de la variable como lo son: toma de perspectiva, empatía cognoscitiva de las emociones, perturbación propia y compasión empática. Dichos factores mostraron validez de constructo y coeficientes alpha de Cronbach moderados y en su conjunto representa una contribución conceptual, metodológica y cultural al estudio de la variable en el contexto romántico.Palabras clave empatía; pareja; cognición; emociones; medición a b S t R a c t

show abstract

Section: Discussionunclassified

unclassified

Empatía en el Contexto Romántico: Diseño y Validación de una Medida

Aragón

Pérez

2016

Univ Psychol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The research of empathy conducted by neurologists (Schwartz, 2013 etc. ), social psychologists (Nickerson, 2009;Stanger, 2012 etc. ), and linguists (Aznabayeva, 2015;Anishchenko, 2015;Tatsenko, 2017, etc.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Event concept of EMPATHY in English juvenile fantasy prose

2020

Cognition, Communication, Discourse

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The article deals with the research of lingual cognitive and pragmatic aspects of empathy in juvenile fantasy prose. It reveals the nature of empathy from the perspective of cognitive linguistics, linguistic emotiology, and pragmalinguistics. The properties of empathy verbalization in juvenile fantasy prose are researched, namely the lexical and grammatical means of verbalization of the corresponding concepts and empathic illocutionary types of psychological support in discursive contexts of the English juvenile fantasy prose. The implementation of both pragmatic and lingual cognitive research findings in the light of cognitive-discursive paradigm revealed the basis of empathy conceptualization and the multifaceted empathic context. The interpretation of empathy meaning is performed by means of schematic cognitive mapping, as well as via establishing the correlation of empathy determinants in discursive contexts which present the communicative strategy of empathy. The componential analysis of definitions of various affective and cognitive states and processes connected with empathy, such as compassion, understanding, sympathy etc., as well as their antonyms, and determination of weight, status and hierarchy of the corresponding semes in vocabulary definitions, showed that generally accepted and empirically proved division of empathy into affective and cognitive is reflected in the language. The analyses revealed affective (feeling, sympathy, sorrow) cognitive (knowledge, ability, understanding) semes in the definitions of empathy types attributing them to either affective or cognitive group. Types of empathy, which belong to the same affective or cognitive group, are not equal in the degree of empathy manifestation. The factor or driving force for upgrading (or downgrading) to a different level is action. While partly addressing social functioning, empathy is turned to cognition and emotion, thus being framed as a social psychological event concept. As an event concept empathy emerges in consciousness and in verbal behavior under the influence of human activity in a certain communicative-pragmatic situation, arising in a variety of constituents of the cognitive and affective parcels of the domain of empathy and unfolding in two scripts which reflect its active and passive manifestations.

show abstract

“…(Goleman, 2011;Hatfield et al, 2009;van Baaren, Decety, Dijksterhuis, van der Leij, & van Leeuwen, 2009;Watson & Greenberg, 2009). When complemented by conscious reflection on the emotional state of the other, emotional contagion and empathy are amplified (Batson, 2009;Nickerson, Butler, & Carlin, 2009) Pheromones also trigger emotion in others as a subconscious source of emotional stimuli (Buck & Ginsburg, 1997). By fostering emotional responses in an observer, these, in company with the other vicarious neural-processes, contribute to emotional awareness.…”

Section: Theoretical Model Of Emotional Intelligencementioning

confidence: 99%

Emotional Intelligence and Positive Organizational Leadership: A Conceptual Model for Positive Emotional Influence

McClellan¹,

DiClementi²

2017

JBAM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

While the relevance of emotional intelligence to leadership and management has been studied and written about for over a decade, most practical models of emotional intelligence still focus primarily on the personal management of negative emotions within the leader. While valuable, this approach delimits the utility of emotional intelligence in relational leadership. Furthermore, it does not take into consideration the significance of positive emotions in leadership. This article provides a review of the literature related to emotional intelligence, leadership, and positive psychology/leadership. It also presents an alternative model for engaging in emotionally intelligent leadership that focuses on the relational nature of emotion and the role of positive emotional influence. Keywords: Emotional Intelligence, Positive Psychology, Positive Organizational Leadership, Vicarious Reinforcing Loop, Inspirational InfluenceThe Traditional Approach to EI Emotional intelligence has been an intensely debated topic since it's rise to public awareness with Goleman's (1995) popular work by the same name. The intensity with which this topic is discussed is evident by the inability of top researchers and minds to agree on a definition for emotional intelligence. Thus, for the purpose of defining EI, we will begin with a definition that is perhaps most shared among the different schools of thought. At its most fundamental level, emotional intelligence relates to the use of the components of mind associated with emotion as opposed to purely rational thought in the application of intelligence. That said, the division emerges relative to whether scholars argue for purely emotional ability based models of EI or whether they promote mixed models that integrate emotional and rational components of intelligence and personality (Walter et al., 2011). These mixed model approaches include any models which measure traits or broader competencies. Thus they are also sometimes referred to as trait models.

show abstract

Empathy and Knowledge Projection

Cited by 36 publications

References 0 publications

Empatía en el Contexto Romántico: Diseño y Validación de una Medida

Empatía en el Contexto Romántico: Diseño y Validación de una Medida

Event concept of EMPATHY in English juvenile fantasy prose

Emotional Intelligence and Positive Organizational Leadership: A Conceptual Model for Positive Emotional Influence

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About