2016
DOI: 10.2172/1330652
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

EMP/GMD Phase 0 Report, A Review of EMP Hazard Environments and Impacts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…are such that the E3 signal is of nearly maximum amplitude [e.g., Rivera et al, 2016, their Figure 23], but the assumed explosion altitude and yield are not usually specified. The parameterizations are generic, but they serve as useful benchmarks for comparison.…”
Section: Spatiotemporal Model Of Disturbancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…are such that the E3 signal is of nearly maximum amplitude [e.g., Rivera et al, 2016, their Figure 23], but the assumed explosion altitude and yield are not usually specified. The parameterizations are generic, but they serve as useful benchmarks for comparison.…”
Section: Spatiotemporal Model Of Disturbancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These impacts were the results of electromagnetic pulses (EMPs) interacting with the atmosphere, the geomagnetic field, and the solid Earth. A nuclear explosion of several hundred kilotons set at altitudes of several hundred kilometers generates an EMP having three semi‐distinct phases (Gombosi et al., 2017; Legro et al., 1985; Rivera et al., 2016). The first, called E1, lasts for less than a microsecond.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations