2012
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-32436-9_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

EmotiWord: Affective Lexicon Creation with Application to Interaction and Multimedia Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The approach of using a common set of ‘seed words’ has been successfully applied to affective text analysis (Turney and Littman 2002; Malandrakis et al . 2011) and warrants further research also for semantic similarity computation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The approach of using a common set of ‘seed words’ has been successfully applied to affective text analysis (Turney and Littman 2002; Malandrakis et al . 2011) and warrants further research also for semantic similarity computation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Semantic similarity is the building block for numerous applications of natural language processing (NLP), such as grammar induction (Meng and Siu 2002) and affective text categorization (Malandrakis et al . 2011). Distributional semantic models (DSM) (Baroni and Lenci 2010) are based on the distributional hypothesis of meaning (Harris 1954) assuming that semantic similarity between words is a function of the overlap of their linguistic contexts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are a variety of open source sentiment lexicons in English used by sentiment detection systems: Sen-tiWordNet [96], EmotiWord [103], the LIWC dictionary [101], WordNet Affect [97], and Sentiful [104] are some of the most widespread.…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, their main disadvantage is the difficulty of building generic extraction patterns and lexicons to extract all sentiment-related expressions contained in the data and to assign them a relevant label in varying contexts. Some authors have proposed different solutions, such as expanding the affective lexicon with new entries based on semantic similarity [103] or linear programming [106].…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 99%