Emotions and Cultural Importance Predict the Acceptance of Large Carnivore Management Strategies by Maasai Pastoralists

Abstract

Management strategies to reduce human-carnivore conflict are most effective when accepted by local communities. Previous studies have suggested that the acceptance depends on emotions toward carnivores, the cultural importance of carnivores, and livestock depredation, and that it may vary depending on the types of strategies and carnivores involved. However, no study so far considered these factors simultaneously to compare their influence on the acceptance of management strategies. We quantified the predictive potential of these factors on the acceptance of three management strategies frequently applied to mitigate human-carnivore conflict: no action, relocation, and lethal control. We interviewed 100 members of the Maasai community in Ngorongoro Conservation Area in Tanzania. We used structured, closed questionnaires and focused on the three large carnivores involved in the most depredation regionally: spotted hyenas (Crocuta crocuta), lions (Panthera leo), and leopards (Panthera pardus). We found that the majority of respondents accepted no action and rejected relocation and lethal control for all three carnivores. The acceptance of the management strategies was strongly influenced by the emotion joy and by the cultural importance of carnivores, and the effects of joy and cultural importance were stronger than the effect of livestock depredation. We conclude that authorities should evaluate the emotions and cultural importance that local communities associate with carnivores when seeking to gain acceptance of management strategies and account for differences between species. Finally, we recommend that future human-carnivore coexistence studies should consider the socio-psychology of local communities and be done longitudinally to detect shifts in cultural, emotional, and ecological factors over time.

Beyond values: How emotions, anthropomorphism, beliefs and knowledge relate to the acceptability of native and non‐native species management in cities

“…Overall, we found that eradication was the least accepted management action for animals (lethal control) and plants (removal) in the urban context, irrespective of the species' origin (native or non-native). The low acceptance for eradication compared to less severe management actions such as unspecified control actions or doing nothing adds evidence to previous studies on animals (Dheer et al, 2021;Jacobs et al, 2014) and plants (Kowarik et al, 2021). However, we show that eradication and unspecified control actions were more accepted for non-native compared to native species, irrespective of whether they are plants or animals.…”

Diurnal pastoralism does not reduce juvenile recruitment nor elevate allostatic load in spotted hyenas

“…Furthermore, such studies on large‐bodied, long‐lived species such as large carnivores are critically lacking. Large carnivores not only provide key ecosystem services, but are often implicated in human–wildlife conflict (Dheer et al, 2021; Nyhus, 2016), so understanding how they can coexist with humans is particularly important.…”

Trends and biases in African large carnivore population assessments: identifying priorities and opportunities from a systematic review of two decades of research

“…Nevertheless, large carnivore populations across Africa have undergone rapid declines in recent decades, primarily as a result of habitat loss and fragmentation, loss of prey, and conflict with humans ( Brodie, Williams & Garner, 2021 ; Wolf & Ripple, 2017 ). As large carnivores can help generate tourism revenue ( Hemson et al, 2009 ), often have strong cultural importance ( Dheer et al, 2021 ), and play a key role in the provision of ecosystem services ( Davidson et al, 2019 ), there are strong practical and intrinsic motivations for the successful conservation of remaining African large carnivore populations.…”