Emotions amplify speaker–listener neural alignment

Abstract

Individuals often align their emotional states during conversation. Here, we reveal how such emotional alignment is reflected in synchronization of brain activity across speakers and listeners. Two “speaker” subjects told emotional and neutral autobiographical stories while their hemodynamic brain activity was measured with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). The stories were recorded and played back to 16 “listener” subjects during fMRI. After scanning, both speakers and listeners rated the moment‐to‐moment valence and arousal of the stories. Time‐varying similarity of the blood‐oxygenation‐level‐dependent (BOLD) time series was quantified by intersubject phase synchronization (ISPS) between speaker–listener pairs. Telling and listening to the stories elicited similar emotions across speaker–listener pairs. Arousal was associated with increased speaker–listener neural synchronization in brain regions supporting attentional, auditory, somatosensory, and motor processing. Valence was associated with increased speaker–listener neural synchronization in brain regions involved in emotional processing, including amygdala, hippocampus, and temporal pole. Speaker–listener synchronization of subjective feelings of arousal was associated with increased neural synchronization in somatosensory and subcortical brain regions; synchronization of valence was associated with neural synchronization in parietal cortices and midline structures. We propose that emotion‐dependent speaker–listener neural synchronization is associated with emotional contagion, thereby implying that listeners reproduce some aspects of the speaker's emotional state at the neural level.

The integration of social and neural synchrony: a case for ecologically valid research using MEG neuroimaging

“…Given that social interaction and cooperation has suggested to synchronize brains during social interaction and cooperation [( Stephens et al. , 2010 ; Smirnov et al. , 2019 ); for reviews, see ( Hasson et al.…”

Classification of emotions based on functional connectivity patterns of the human brain

“…The stimuli were 35 one-minute-long narratives representing six emotional states (anger, fear, disgust, happiness, sadness, surprise) and a neutral state (five narratives per category). The narratives described personal life events spoken by a female speaker with natural emotional prosody and included emotional expressions, such as weeping and laughing, and have been shown to elicit strong affect in listeners (Smirnov et al, 2019). A separate sample of twenty-four females (ages 20-37, mean age = 24.4 years) rated the stories for the emotional content (Supplementary Figure S1).…”

Imaging real-time tactile interaction with two-person dual-coil fMRI

“…The communicative information can then be presented to the receiver subjects as stimuli during brain imaging, allowing joint analysis of the brain activity of the sender and receiver subjects. This line of work has revealed how successful communication via speech (Smirnov et al, 2019;Stephens et al, 2010), hand gestures (Schippers et al, 2010;Smirnov et al, 2017) and facial expressions (Anders et al, 2011) enhances similarity of neural activation patterns across the interlocutors in a task-specific manner. This approach however lacks any interactivity, as the receiver subjects are essentially viewing pre-recorded stimuli, and need not to generate any responses to them.…”