Emotions in Sport and Games 2020
DOI: 10.4324/9781003105961-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Emotional sharing in football audiences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Pride colors were an immediately recognizable affective practice of support and similarity that signified shared affiliations serving to connect attendees and fostering a sense of belonging, inclusion, and togetherness (Formby, 2017; Guibernau, 2013). As with sports merchandize, this creates and affirms individual and collective identity to “promote a sense of community among supporters and facilitate social integration” (Derbaix & Decrop, 2011, p. 288) as well as encourage inclusivity because they could be worn or displayed by anyone (Stieler & Germelmann, 2016; Thonhauser & Wetzels, 2019). The sense of togetherness, within and beyond the parade, would be reinforced by the shared Pride symbols and blurring of boundaries between us‐and‐them that this achieves.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pride colors were an immediately recognizable affective practice of support and similarity that signified shared affiliations serving to connect attendees and fostering a sense of belonging, inclusion, and togetherness (Formby, 2017; Guibernau, 2013). As with sports merchandize, this creates and affirms individual and collective identity to “promote a sense of community among supporters and facilitate social integration” (Derbaix & Decrop, 2011, p. 288) as well as encourage inclusivity because they could be worn or displayed by anyone (Stieler & Germelmann, 2016; Thonhauser & Wetzels, 2019). The sense of togetherness, within and beyond the parade, would be reinforced by the shared Pride symbols and blurring of boundaries between us‐and‐them that this achieves.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Die Diversität des Forschungsbereiches ist gleichzeitig sein Fluch, was besonders in Bezug auf die Kollektive vor Ort zu beobachten Exklusivität des Bereiches der Fußballforschung, sondern beruhen auf einer historischen Begriffsentwicklung, bedingt durch die populäre Theorie zur Psychologie der Massen von Gustave LeBon (2016). Da dieser Bereich schon aus unterschiedlichen Perspektiven kritisch behandelt wurde(Borch 2012;Thonhauser/Wetzels 2019), sei hier auf das wichtigste Signum dieser Forschungslinie hingewiesen, die Triebhaftigkeit, Erregbarkeit und gegenseitige Ansteckung einzelner Individuen in Massen. Diese fördere nicht nur, dass die Einzelnen in den Gebilden einer »Menschenmasse« nicht mehr zur Logik fähig seien (vgl.Le Bon 2016: 35), sondern es findet auch eine »Kollektivhalluzination« statt (vgl.…”
unclassified