Emotional processes in binge drinking: A systematic review and perspective

Lannoy, Séverine; Duka, Theodora; Carbia, Carina; Billieux, Joël; Fontesse, Sullivan; Dormal, Valérie; Gierski, Fabien; López‐Caneda, Eduardo; Sullivan, Edith V.; Maurage, Pierre

doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2021.101971

Cited by 57 publications

(41 citation statements)

References 115 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Although binge behaviors are usually initiated for recreational purposes, they may lead to harmful consequences. Bingeing is indeed associated with a variety of health problems (e.g., obesity, diabetes, alcoholic cirrhosis, thrombosis and pulmonary embolism; Fazzino et al, 2017 , Rangarajan and Forman, 2019 , Udo and Grilo, 2019 , Ventura-Cots et al, 2017 ), sleep disruption ( Exelmans & Van den Bulck, 2017 ), impaired cognitive and emotional functioning ( Carbia et al, 2018 , Lannoy et al, 2021 ), decreased academic and work performance ( Jennison, 2004 , Kuntsche et al, 2017 , Pawaskar et al, 2017 , Rubenking et al, 2018 ), increased risky behaviors (e.g., unsafe sexual behaviors; Hingson et al, 2017 ; Townshend et al, 2014 , Wéry et al, 2016 ), social and relationship disturbances ( Vaterlaus et al, 2019 , Werner et al, 2018 ), and, more globally, reduced quality of life ( Rieger et al, 2005 ). As a result, unmoderated and unrestrained indulgence in binge behaviors can ultimately lead to severe and potentially long-lasting effects on a person’s physical, psychological, and social health, thus posing a serious public health concern.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Binge behaviors: Assessment, determinants, and consequences

Flayelle

Lannoy

2021

Addictive Behaviors Reports

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Binge behaviors: Assessment, determinants, and consequences

Flayelle

Lannoy

2021

Addictive Behaviors Reports

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Despite the fact that our search explored all alcohol consumption misuses, the selected studies focused on SAUD as studies exploring social decision making in other problematic consumption patterns (e.g., heavy drinking, binge drinking) did not fulfill our selection criteria. However, emotional and social cognition deficits have been reported in these subclinical populations (e.g., Lannoy et al, 2021), suggesting potential impairments in social decision making. The generalizability of our review is thus limited, and future research should explore social decision making in subclinical populations.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Social decision making in severe alcohol use disorder: Scoping review and experimental perspectives

Gautier¹,

Pabst²,

Maurage³

2021

Alcoholism Clin & Exp Res

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Patients with severe alcohol use disorder (SAUD) demonstrate multifaceted impairments in social cognition abilities, including emotional decoding or Theory of Mind. Such impairments are associated with real‐life interpersonal difficulties, which in turn could contribute to the persistence of SAUD. However, little is known regarding how patients with SAUD make decisions in a social context and this literature has not been comprehensively reviewed. Objectives The main aim of this paper was to conduct the first review specifically focusing on social decision‐making abilities in SAUD. Following PRISMA guidelines for scoping reviews, we describe existing knowledge regarding the difficulties experienced by patients with SAUD during social interactions. Our second objective was to propose perspectives for future research, based on the shortcomings identified in the available literature. Design We searched three online databases (PubMed, PsycINFO, and Scopus) and identified 14 papers using behavioral tasks to assess social decision making in patients with SAUD. Results Included studies assessed social decision making through three paradigms: (1) economic games (four papers), (2) moral dilemmas (four papers), and (3) interpersonal problem‐solving (six papers). Results indicated that patients with SAUD behave differently from controls in all three paradigms. Conclusions Previous studies suggested large‐scale social decision‐making impairments or biases in SAUD. However, in light of the limited number of studies available and of the restricted set of processes measured, we call for the extension of this field through more ecologically relevant and model‐based paradigms in order to elucidate the underlying mechanisms of these effects.

show abstract

“…Studies have previously shown greater cognitive impairment in binge drinkers as compared to non-binge drinkers (e.g., Weissenborn and Duka, 2003). In a recent review, Lannoy et al (2021) detected 10 studies that investigated the ability of binge drinkers to identify emotional expressions. Their findings highlight consistent difficulties to recognize fear among binge drinkers when compared to controls.…”

Section: The Question Of Internal Validitymentioning

confidence: 99%

The dosing procedure that “makes the poison”: Comparing the effects of single versus cumulative alcohol administration methods on emotion recognition

2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Most people often consume alcohol cumulatively and gradually. Yet almost scientific knowledge about alcohol’s acute effects on cognition, behavior, and affect stems from laboratory studies that employ a single beverage administration procedure. Objective: This study tests the hypothesis that alcohol’s acute effects depend on both methods of administration and alcohol blood level. We introduce a new laboratory procedure for studying cumulative alcohol drinking and examine alcohol’s effects on emotion recognition as a function of both alcohol administration method and alcohol blood level. Methods: Participants were recruited for one of two studies. One study employed a between-subject design using a single alcoholic dose. Participants were randomly assigned to drink either placebo (0.00%), low (0.03%), moderate (0.06%), or high (0.09%) alcohol levels. The second study employed a within-subject design using a cumulative alcoholic administration method, in which each participant drank four drinks (placebo, followed by three alcoholic drinks). Both groups reached similar breath alcohol concentrations. In both studies, participants attended a single study session, in which emotion recognition was examined following alcohol administration. Results: Single alcoholic beverage administration method caused greater impairment in emotion recognition ability, specifically for anger, happiness, and fear, as compared with cumulative administration method, even though breath alcohol levels were similar in both conditions. Conclusions: This paper presents questions concerning the internal validity of previous laboratory studies that use a single beverage administration procedure. Insights into the effects of alcohol on behavior, as well as regarding our knowledge about models of addiction are presented.

show abstract

Emotional processes in binge drinking: A systematic review and perspective

Cited by 57 publications

References 115 publications

Binge behaviors: Assessment, determinants, and consequences

Binge behaviors: Assessment, determinants, and consequences

Social decision making in severe alcohol use disorder: Scoping review and experimental perspectives

The dosing procedure that “makes the poison”: Comparing the effects of single versus cumulative alcohol administration methods on emotion recognition

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About