Emotional modulation of spinal nociception and pain: The impact of predictable noxious stimulation

Abstract

Recent evidence suggests that emotional picture-viewing is a reliable method of engaging descending modulation of spinal nociception. The present study attempted to replicate these findings and determine the effect of noxious stimulus predictability. Participants viewed pictures from the International Affective Picture System (IAPS), during which pain and nociceptive flexion reflexes (NFR) were elicited by electric shocks delivered to the sural nerve. For half of the participants (n=25) shocks were preceded by a cue (predictable), whereas the other half received no cue (unpredictable). Results suggested emotion was successfully induced by pictures, but the effect of picture-viewing on the NFR was moderated by the predictability of the shocks. When shock was unpredictable, spinal nociception (NFR) and pain ratings were modulated in parallel. Specifically, pain and NFR magnitudes were lower during pleasant emotions and higher during unpleasant emotions. However, when shocks were predictable, only pain was modulated in this way. NFRs from predictable shocks were not altered by pictures. Further, exploratory analyses found that pain ratings, but not NFRs, were lower during predictable shocks. These data suggest emotional picture-viewing is a reliable method of engaging descending modulation of spinal nociception. However, descending modulation could not be detected in NFRs resulting from predictable noxious stimuli. Although preliminary, this study implies that separate mechanisms are responsible for emotional modulation of nociception at spinal vs. supraspinal levels, and that predictable noxious events may disengage modulation at the spinal level. The current paradigm could serve as a useful tool for studying descending modulation.

Keeping pain in mind: A motivational account of attention to pain

“…Note that in the study of Hoffman et al (2006) participants in the high tech condition also reported having more "fun" in the virtual world compared with the low tech condition, suggesting that at least part of the distraction effect might have been due to positive affect experienced during the procedure. This is in line with several studies which have shown that viewing pleasant pictures during nociceptive stimulation increased pain tolerance (de Wied & Verbaten, 2001;Meagher et al, 2001) and reduced pain intensity (Rhudy et al, 2006). Similarly, it has been shown that listening to preferred music increased pain tolerance (Mitchell et al, 2006).…”

Cervical Referral of Head Pain in Migraineurs: Effects on the Nociceptive Blink Reflex

“…Second, participants, armed with the knowledge that they could terminate the experimental session at any time, were in control, further lessening the role of psychological factors. [78][79][80][81][82][83] Third, pain ratings to the supraorbital stimuli were comparable for the cervical and arm interventions, and remained unchanged across the trials. This dissociation between pain perception and R2 activity supports the possibility that the reductions in referred head pain, cervical tenderness, and inhibition of R2 were due to a specific "cervical," neurophysiological effect, rather than psychological influences.…”

The effects of anger and sadness on clinical pain reports and experimentally‐induced pain thresholds in women with and without fibromyalgia

“…Neurally, there is a close anatomic relationship between pain and emotion circuits in the brain (6,7), with emotional and physical pain sharing a common neural alarm system (8 -10). Physiologically, increased sympathetic activation, decreased opioid pain inhibition, and muscular reactivity in response to negative emotions can increase nociception (7,11). Psychologically, negative emotions may increase attention to and bias the processing of stimuli (7,(12)(13)(14), leading to hypervigilance, symptom worry, misattribution of arousal to somatic sources, and avoidance behavior (14).…”