2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ridd.2013.08.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Emotional intelligence, emotions, and feelings of support staff working with clients with intellectual disabilities and challenging behavior: An exploratory study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a previous study of Zijlmans et al . (), only weak relationships were found between EI and emotions, suggesting that a training focused on EI does not heavily affect experienced emotions of staff. Although research has focused on organisational factors related to emotions and burnout, future research should clarify the relationship between organisational factors and training effectiveness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…In a previous study of Zijlmans et al . (), only weak relationships were found between EI and emotions, suggesting that a training focused on EI does not heavily affect experienced emotions of staff. Although research has focused on organisational factors related to emotions and burnout, future research should clarify the relationship between organisational factors and training effectiveness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The Cronbach's alpha coefficients for the five subscales ranged from 0.69 to 0.86 (Zijlmans et al . ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The questionnaire results in one general EQ score and five subscale scores related to intrapersonal ability, intrapersonal skills, amount of adaptability, stress management skills and general mood. The Cronbach's alpha coefficients for the five subscales ranged from 0.69 to 0.86 (Zijlmans, Embregts, & Bosman, ), which is considered questionable to good. None of the participants in this study was excluded based on the so‐called inconsistency index above 12, which indicates unreliable answering tendencies (Zijlmans et al., ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Cronbach's alpha coefficients for the five subscales ranged from 0.69 to 0.86 (Zijlmans, Embregts, & Bosman, ), which is considered questionable to good. None of the participants in this study was excluded based on the so‐called inconsistency index above 12, which indicates unreliable answering tendencies (Zijlmans et al., ). Each subscale is standardized to a mean of 100 ( SD = 15).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%