2010
DOI: 10.1177/1548051809350894
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Emotional Intelligence and Transformational and Transactional Leadership: A Meta-Analysis

Abstract: The purpose of this study is to evaluate claims that emotional intelligence is significantly related to transformational and other leadership behaviors. Results (based on 62 independent samples) indicated a validity estimate of .59 when ratings of both emotional intelligence and leadership behaviors were provided by the same source (self, subordinates, peers, or superiors). However, when ratings of the constructs were derived from different sources, the validity estimate was .12. Lower validity estimates were … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

11
311
2
13

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 352 publications
(337 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
11
311
2
13
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the self-rating of performance showed about the same relationship with PsyCap as did other ratings (from supervisors/managers), there may not be as big a problem with same source bias issues with regard to Psy-Cap compared to other constructs. For example, a recent meta-analysis of the relationship between emotional intelligence and leadership found a validity estimate of 0.59 when ratings were provided by the same source, but dramatically dropped to 0.12 when the ratings were derived from different sources (Harms & Crede, 2010). Obviously, in future PsyCap research, objective measures of performance would be most valid, but at least in combination with other sources, self-ratings may make a contribution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the self-rating of performance showed about the same relationship with PsyCap as did other ratings (from supervisors/managers), there may not be as big a problem with same source bias issues with regard to Psy-Cap compared to other constructs. For example, a recent meta-analysis of the relationship between emotional intelligence and leadership found a validity estimate of 0.59 when ratings were provided by the same source, but dramatically dropped to 0.12 when the ratings were derived from different sources (Harms & Crede, 2010). Obviously, in future PsyCap research, objective measures of performance would be most valid, but at least in combination with other sources, self-ratings may make a contribution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This might explain the consistent findings among researchers indicating positive correlation between EI and contingent reward. Research has found that contingent reward has a positive relationship with EI at comparable levels to that of TL [27], and that it has a significant positive correlation with the ability to monitor one's emotions and those of others [40]. This construct has also been found to correlate significantly with total TL and several of its components, including idealized influence, inspirational motivation and individual consideration.…”
Section: Relationship Between Emotional Intelligence and Transactionamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Popularity of TL style as well as its specific elements that are relevant to EI has also led to a keen interest in this form of leadership [27]. Regarding EIleadership styles relationship, the findings of the previous studies are not conclusive and this justifies the need for further research.…”
Section: Theoretical and Empirical Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Yet, even in regard to the psychological features of leadership, we have witnessed a fascinating and desperately needed evolution over the past several decades. With the growing speed of electronic communications, employees became more aware and informed, and therefore increasingly vocal and resolute about the qualities they desire from their leaders (Boyatzis, 1982; Goleman, 1997Goleman, , 2003Harms & Crede, 2010). Hard skills, such as intelligence, analytical/technical prowess, determination, rigor, and vision -the defining leadership traits of the twentieth century -were maneuvered to the backseat in order to make way for softer skills, which Goleman (2000) identifies as self-awareness, self-regulation, motivation, and empathy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%