Emotional Intelligence and Consumer Ethics: The Mediating Role of Personal Moral Philosophies

Abstract

Research on the antecedents of consumers' ethical beliefs has mainly examined cognitive variables and has (with a few exceptions) neglected the relationships among affective variables and consumer ethics. However, research in moral psychology indicates that moral emotions have a significant role in ethical decision-making (Haidt, Handbook of affective sciences, 2003). Thus, the ability to experience, perceive and regulate emotions should influence consumers' ethical decision-making. These abilities, which are components of emotional intelligence (Davies et al., J Person Soc Psychol, 1998), are examined as antecedents to consumers' ethical beliefs in this study. Five hundred Australian consumers participated in this study by completing an online questionnaire that included measures of emotional intelligence, consumers' ethical beliefs and personal moral philosophies (idealism and relativism, Forsyth, J Person Soc Psychol, 1980). Results demonstrate that the ability to appraise and express emotions in oneself is directly negatively related to beliefs regarding actively benefiting from illegal actions as a consumer, passively benefiting at the expense of the seller and actively benefiting from questionable but legal actions as a consumer. The ability to appraise and express emotions in oneself is directly positively related to beliefs regarding 'doing-good' (pro-social) actions. The ability to appraise and recognise emotions in others is also directly positively related to beliefs regarding 'doing-good' actions as well as pro-environmental buying actions. The effects of the different components of emotional intelligence on consumers' ethical beliefs are (in most cases) mediated by personal moral philosophies. This study demonstrates the relationship between emotional intelligence and consumer ethics and highlights the interplay of affect and cognition in consumers' ethical decision-making.

An EEG Study on Emotional Intelligence and Advertising Message Effectiveness

“…In an attempt to better understand advertising communication preferences by high- and low-EI groups, we assumed that high EI would be more interested in social interactions, community issues, ethical buying practices, and people-related themed adverts as supported by previous research [20,62]. In comparison, we assumed that low EI would show higher preference for nonsocial and low for people interaction themes, (e.g., show higher preference for food and industrial functional advertising themes).…”

“…According to Salovey et al [16,17], there are different aspects or facets of EI including the ability to appraise emotions and adapt emotional expressions according to situational conditions, cognitively synthesize past emotional experiences into coherent patterns for future application, and generate and regulate the expression of appropriate emotions [16]. People with higher emotional intelligence tend to have greater self-understanding [18], manage amicably interpersonal relations and are more effective in communications [19], and may use moral ethics in decision-making [20]. Several brain regions have been proposed to be part of the functional network associated with the emotional cognition.…”

Ethical Behaviors and Wealth: Generation Y’s Experience

“…This suggests no matter how many guidelines regulators and trade associations issue, they are fighting against primal human emotions. Chowdhury (2015) links the ability of a person to express and understand their own emotions with being more likely to make pro-social actions. These studies suggest financial regulators might get better ethical results by focusing on basic human emotions as well as issuing guidelines and rules.…”

A relativistic approach to moral judgment in individuals: Review and reinterpretation

“…Both McHoskey and colleagues () and Chowdhury () reported a correlation of .46 between EPQ Relativism scores and a quest religious orientation that involves a willingness to face existential questions in all their complexity, a perception of religious doubts as positive, and an openness and receptivity to possible changes in one's religious views. This finding seems sensible in light of the openness to experience and tolerance of ambiguity that characterize high relativists, and does not immediately suggest self‐interest or dubious ethics.…”