1996
DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.71.3.588
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Emotional expression and physical health: Revising traumatic memories or fostering self-regulation?

Abstract: Health benefits derived from personal trauma disclosure are well established. This study examined whether disclosing emotions generated by imaginative immersion in a novel traumatic event would similarly enhance health and adjustment. College women, preselected for trauma presence, were randomly assigned to write about real traumas, imaginary traumas, or trivial events. Yoked real-trauma and imaginary-trauma participants wrote about real-trauma participants' experiences. Imaginary-trauma participants were sign… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

9
249
3
12

Year Published

1997
1997
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 274 publications
(273 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
9
249
3
12
Order By: Relevance
“…In sum, these findings suggest that individuals high in fear of rejection benefit from written emotional expression by gaining a new understanding of emotional experiences, thereby promoting general self-regulatory processes (Greenberg, Wortman, & Stone, 1996;King & Miner, 2000). In our view, written emotional expression is an intentional strategy that may serve to compensate for a lack of perceived social support typically experienced by individuals high in fear of rejection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…In sum, these findings suggest that individuals high in fear of rejection benefit from written emotional expression by gaining a new understanding of emotional experiences, thereby promoting general self-regulatory processes (Greenberg, Wortman, & Stone, 1996;King & Miner, 2000). In our view, written emotional expression is an intentional strategy that may serve to compensate for a lack of perceived social support typically experienced by individuals high in fear of rejection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…This disclosure changes the emotional and cognitive processing of stressful experience in a way that the stressful experiences lose their power to distract cognition, disrupt emotions and to trigger physiological stress reactions (Lepore, Greenberg, Bruno, & Smyth, 2002;Pennebaker, Mayne, & Francis, 1997). The cognitive changes as a result of emotional disclosure may include that individuals gain a deeper understanding of their negative emotional responses to stressors , which again facilitates emotionregulation strategies (Greenberg, Wortmann, & Stone, 1996). According to Pennebaker and Seagal (1999), putting stressful experiences into words through emotional disclosure fosters the integration of those experiences into a coherent narrative that may render the stressful experience more meaningfully.…”
Section: Emotional Disclosure As a Stress-coping Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although some studies have suggested that written disclosure is associated with improvements in physical and psychological health, findings from other studies have suggested that written disclosure may not produce significant health changes (see Sloan & Marx, 2004b, for a review). These equivocal outcomes are not surprising given that a number of investigators have unsystematically altered various aspects of the procedure, such as the number of writing sessions used (Greenberg, Wortman, & Stone, 1996;Lepore, 1997, Stroebe, Stroebe, Schut, Zech, & van den Bout, 2002, the duration of the writing sessions (Greenberg et al, 1996;Schoutrop, Lange, Hanewald, Duurland, & Bermond, 1997;Stroebe et al, 2002), and the length of time between writing sessions (Esterling, Antoni, Fletcher, Marguiles, & Schneiderman, 1994;Schoutrop et al, 1997;Stanton et al, 2002). In general, investigators have not provided a rationale for such methodological alterations, nor do they include appropriate comparison groups to examine the effect of such alterations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%