2016
DOI: 10.1017/sjp.2016.78
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Emotional Dependency and Dysfunctional Relationship Beliefs as Predictors of Married Turkish Individuals’ Relationship Satisfaction

Abstract: In this study, we examined married individuals' relationship satisfaction in relation to their emotional dependency and dysfunctional relationship beliefs. Our participants consisted of 203 female and 181 male, a total of 384 married individuals from urban cities of Turkey. Controlling the effects of gender and length of marriage, we performed a hierarchical regression analysis. Results revealed that married Turkish individuals' relationship satisfaction was significantly explained by their emotional dependenc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0
6

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
9
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…When evaluating the direct effects, the main factors of emotional dependency are considered, and it is thought that the positive emotions shared by the parents about their premature babies, such as love, bonding, and affection; shared negative emotions, such as fear, concern, and despair; and the parents seeing each other as the most significant source of support and becoming attachment figures for each other may be the main factors that support the results of this study (Feeney, 2007). In their study, Ozturk and Aydin (2017) found that one of the key psychosocial factors linked to perinatal depression is having marital problems.…”
Section: Emotional Dependency and Post-traumatic Growthmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…When evaluating the direct effects, the main factors of emotional dependency are considered, and it is thought that the positive emotions shared by the parents about their premature babies, such as love, bonding, and affection; shared negative emotions, such as fear, concern, and despair; and the parents seeing each other as the most significant source of support and becoming attachment figures for each other may be the main factors that support the results of this study (Feeney, 2007). In their study, Ozturk and Aydin (2017) found that one of the key psychosocial factors linked to perinatal depression is having marital problems.…”
Section: Emotional Dependency and Post-traumatic Growthmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Así, Moral, García, Cuetos y Sirvent (2017), al comprobar las relaciones existentes entre Violencia del noviazgo, Dependencia emocional y Autoestima en adolescentes y jóvenes, obtuvieron que los varones ejercían con más frecuencia procesos de acomodación y de manipulación, hallándose un tasa superior de violencia y dependencia emocional en los estudiantes de Educación Secundaria frente a los universitarios. También se ha investigado la relación de la dependencia emocional con el perfil cognitivo (Lemos-Hoyos, Jaller-Jaramillo, González-Calle, Díaz-León, y De la Ossa, 2012), la formación de esquemas cognitivos desadaptativos (Urbiola y Estévez, 2015), el uso de las redes sociales y las nuevas tecnologías (Estévez, Urbiola, Iruarrizaga, Onaindia y Jauregui, 2017), las relaciones maritales (Kemer, Yildiz, y Bulgan, 2016), la ansiedad y la depresión (Urbiola, Estévez, Iruarrizaga, y Jáuregui, 2017) o el estilo de apego adulto (Valle y Moral, 2018), entre otros. Asimismo, resulta de interés la vinculación de la dependencia emocional con la búsqueda de sensaciones y el autoengaño, como principales factores descriptivos.…”
unclassified
“…There is no study in literature that examines relationship beliefs directly with social support and relationship depth. There are studies that have reached similar findings, that is, non-functional beliefs about marriage negatively affect marital adjustment (Eidelson & Epstein, 1982;Hamamcı, 2005;Möller & van Zyl, 1991) and burnout (Koolaee, Adibrad & Sedgh poor, 2010;Kemer, Çetinkaya Yıldız & Bulgan, 2016). Studies which explored the role of close relationship beliefs in romantic relationships other than marriage also examined the effect of these beliefs on relationship quality and relationship satisfaction Goodwin & Gaines, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Literatür incelendiğinde ilişki inançlarının genellikle evlilik çatışması, çift/evlilik uyumu, ilişki kalitesi, evlilik doyumu gibi ilişki süreçleriyle ilişkilendirildiği görülmektedir (DeBord, Romans & Krieshok, 1996;Eidelson & Epstein, 1982;Esmaeilpour, Khajeh & Mahdavi, 2013;Goodwin & Gaines, 2004;Hamamcı, 2005;Metts & Cupach, 1990;Möller & van Zyl, 1991;Sullivan & Schwebel, 1995). İlişki inançlarının doğrudan sosyal destek ve ilişki derinliğiyle birlikte ele alındığı bir çalışmaya rastlanmamıştır ancak evlilik ilişkisine yönelik işlevsel olmayan inançların evlilik uyumunu (Eidelson & Epstein, 1982;Hamamcı, 2005;Möller & van Zyl, 1991) ve tükenmişliği (Koolaee, Adibrad, & Sedgh poor, 2010;Kemer, Çetinkaya Yıldız & Bulgan, 2016) olumsuz yönde etkilediğine ilişkin araştırmalar mevcuttur. Evlilik ilişkisi dışındaki romantik ilişkilerde yakın ilişki inançlarının rolünü araştıran araştırmalar da bu inançların ilişki kalitesi ve ilişki doyumu üzerindeki etkilerini incelemişlerdir Goodwin & Gaines, 2004).…”
Section: Yorumunclassified