2010
DOI: 10.1002/jclp.20662
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Emotional awareness in substance‐dependent patients

Abstract: We explored emotional awareness in substance-dependent patients and its relationships to self-reported alexithymia. Sixty-four outpatients with drug dependence or alcohol dependence were evaluated before the beginning of treatment with the Hamilton Depressive Scale and the Covi Anxiety Scale, and they completed the Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20) and the Levels of Emotional Awareness Scale (LEAS). Subjects exhibited low levels of emotional awareness and TAS-20 scores were high. Both measures were not relate… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As literature suggests (Carton et al 2010;Jouanne et al 2005) LEAS scores in DG were significantly lower than in HG, both in awareness of self and others' emotions. Performances on LEAS pointed to fewer competencies in these patients for symbolizing emotional experience by explicit and differentiate forms, providing additional evidence for difficulties in processing and expressing the experience of distinct and complex emotions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As literature suggests (Carton et al 2010;Jouanne et al 2005) LEAS scores in DG were significantly lower than in HG, both in awareness of self and others' emotions. Performances on LEAS pointed to fewer competencies in these patients for symbolizing emotional experience by explicit and differentiate forms, providing additional evidence for difficulties in processing and expressing the experience of distinct and complex emotions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Thus, many addicts seem only to be capable of diminished levels of empathy (Jouanne et al 2005;Carton et al 2010), which is compatible with high levels of alexithymia. Similar to other studies with healthy samples (Lane et al 1996) alexithymia and emotional experience abilities studied in those drug users samples did not correlate significantly (Carton et al 2010) although constructs were inversely related as suggested by the literature.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One other important point concerns the clinical application of the scale, which allows one to characterize the emotional processes of patients in clinical populations such as substance‐dependent patients (Carton et al, 2010), patients with anxiety disorders (Novick‐Kline, Turk, Mennin, Hoyt, & Gallagher, 2005), psychiatric symptoms (Donges et al, 2005), or eating disorders (Bydlowski et al, 2005; Rommel et al, 2012).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After responding to a short questionnaire pertaining to sociodemographic information, the subjects from all three samples completed the LEAS. The three scorers of the LEAS are experimental psychologist/psychiatrists involved in the French validation of the tool or in different studies using the scale (Bydlowski et al, 2005; Carton et al, 2010; Rommel et al, 2012). After a comparison of the glossaries used and a common practicing of the LEAS scoring, 13 protocols were independently coded by the three evaluators.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Associations between subjective self-measures and performance-based measures are heterogeneous, with studies generally demonstrating either no relationship at all (Carton et al, 2010; Lumley, Gustavson, Partridge, & Labouvie-Vief, 2005; Subic-Wrana, Bruder, Thomas, Lane, & Kohle, 2005) or else positive or negative correlations between them (Lane, Sechrest, & Riedel, 1998; Lane, Sechrest, Riedel, Shapiro, & Kaszniak, 2000). LEAS and TAS-20 scores have also been shown to correlate differently in the presence of psychopathological disorders such as addiction (Jouanne, Edel & Carton, 2005; Lindsay & Ciarrochi, 2009).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%