Abstract:During the crisis situation caused due to COVID-19 disease, managing mental health and psychological well-being is as important as physical health of people. As web based life is broadly utilized by individuals to communicate their feeling and supposition, our framework utilizes Twitter information posted by individuals during this emergency circumstance to dissect the feelings of individuals. For processing the cleaned data NRC Word-Emotion Association Lexicon (have aka EmoLex) is used. NRC Word-Emotion Assoc… Show more
“…However, to the best of our knowledge, they appear to use a significantly different methodology. Those works include Sentiment Analysis with Deep Learning Classifiers (Chakraborty et al, 2020;Li et al, 2020), a time-span of much fewer days (Abd-Alrazaq et al, 2020;Xue et al, 2020), and analyses of specific emotions without topic models (Lwin et al, 2020;Mathur et al, 2020). Because topic modeling is an exploratory, bottom-up, data-driven technique of data mining, we believe that a broader and more explorative approach, that takes into account multiple topic modeling solutions and a longer time span, may provide better insights on the themes discussed by Twitter users over time.…”
Section: Topicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of political messaging during electoral campaigns, positive feedback might correlate with voters' support for a specific candidate. In some cases, as pointed out by recent studies, social media analyses during crisis situations may be used to investigate real-time public opinion and thus help authorities to gain insight for quickly deciding for the best assistance policies to be taken (Mathur et al, 2020).…”
The words we use to talk about the current epidemiological crisis on social media can inform us on how we are conceptualizing the pandemic and how we are reacting to its development. This paper provides an extensive explorative analysis of how the discourse about Covid-19 reported on Twitter changes through time, focusing on the first wave of this pandemic. Based on an extensive corpus of tweets (produced between 20th March and 1st July 2020) first we show how the topics associated with the development of the pandemic changed through time, using topic modeling. Second, we show how the sentiment polarity of the language used in the tweets changed from a relatively positive valence during the first lockdown, toward a more negative valence in correspondence with the reopening. Third we show how the average subjectivity of the tweets increased linearly and fourth, how the popular and frequently used figurative frame of WAR changed when real riots and fights entered the discourse.
“…However, to the best of our knowledge, they appear to use a significantly different methodology. Those works include Sentiment Analysis with Deep Learning Classifiers (Chakraborty et al, 2020;Li et al, 2020), a time-span of much fewer days (Abd-Alrazaq et al, 2020;Xue et al, 2020), and analyses of specific emotions without topic models (Lwin et al, 2020;Mathur et al, 2020). Because topic modeling is an exploratory, bottom-up, data-driven technique of data mining, we believe that a broader and more explorative approach, that takes into account multiple topic modeling solutions and a longer time span, may provide better insights on the themes discussed by Twitter users over time.…”
Section: Topicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of political messaging during electoral campaigns, positive feedback might correlate with voters' support for a specific candidate. In some cases, as pointed out by recent studies, social media analyses during crisis situations may be used to investigate real-time public opinion and thus help authorities to gain insight for quickly deciding for the best assistance policies to be taken (Mathur et al, 2020).…”
The words we use to talk about the current epidemiological crisis on social media can inform us on how we are conceptualizing the pandemic and how we are reacting to its development. This paper provides an extensive explorative analysis of how the discourse about Covid-19 reported on Twitter changes through time, focusing on the first wave of this pandemic. Based on an extensive corpus of tweets (produced between 20th March and 1st July 2020) first we show how the topics associated with the development of the pandemic changed through time, using topic modeling. Second, we show how the sentiment polarity of the language used in the tweets changed from a relatively positive valence during the first lockdown, toward a more negative valence in correspondence with the reopening. Third we show how the average subjectivity of the tweets increased linearly and fourth, how the popular and frequently used figurative frame of WAR changed when real riots and fights entered the discourse.
“…Setelah World Health Organization (WHO) menyatakan Corona Virus Disease of 2019 (Covid-19) sebagai wabah pandemi pada awal tahun 2020, penggunaan dan penerapan aplikasi daring bertambah digunakan dalam berbagai bidang untuk mencegah penyebaran Covid-19 karena dapat menjaga jarak atau mengurangi kerumunan. Selama pandemi Covid-19 berlangsung terdapat penyebaran informasi tidak tepat (Mathur, Kubde, & Vaidya, 2020) . Berdasarkan informasi palsu yang disampaikan, terdapat pengaruh dari penyampaian berita hoaks tersebut mengenai virus Covid-19 yang terdapat pada internet terhadap pembentukan opini masyarakat (Roy & Junaidi, 2020) dengan persentase sebesar 58,7% yang dapat mempengaruhi pengguna internet dan 41,3% lainnya dipengaruhi oleh faktor lain.…”
During Covid-19 pandemic, there was various hoax news about Covid-19. There are truth-clarification platforms for hoax news about Covid-19 such as Jala Hoax and Saber Hoax which categorize into misinformation and disinformation. Classification of supervised learning methods is applied to carry out learning from fact labels. Dataset is taken from Jala Hoax and Saber Hoax as many as 559 data which are made into Class 1 (Misleading Content, Satire/Parody, False Connection), Class 2 (False Context, Imposter Content), Class 3 (Fabricated and Manipulated Content). K-Nearest Neighbor (K-NN) is used to classify categories of misinformation and disinformation. Dissimilarity measure Jaccard Distance is compared with Euclidean, Manhattan, and Minkowski and uses k-value variance in the K-NN to determine the performance comparison results for each test. Results of Jaccard Distance at the value of k = 4 get a higher value than other model with an accuracy 0.696, precision 0.710, recall 0.572, and F1-Score. Maximum results tend to be on label of the most data class in Class 1 (Misleading Content, Satire or Parody, False Connection) with a total of 58 correct data from 61 test data.
“…Castells (2017) gives examples of the Arab Spring demonstrations in 2010 and the Occupy Wall Street movement in 2011. Mathur, Kubde, and Vaidya (2020) used Twitter data to analyze across the world the mental health of people during the COVID-19 pandemic situation through emotion analysis and classified it into basic emotions. The idea is via their analysis, authorities can better understand the mental health of the people and update the content accordingly.…”
This article examined the personal profiles of the Heads of Government of countries in South/North America and how they communicated with their audiences on institutional measures to contain COVID-19. Analyses were carried out on data collected from Twitter from November-2019 to November-2020. This study includes: i)quantitative analysis, measuring categories and emphases in the communication of tweets, retweets, likes, and comments on matters relevant to the pandemic; ii)qualitative analysis that allowed evaluating speeches to identify political interference and the effectiveness of communication at critical moments of the pandemic. It was possible to infer that each president has his singularities and understanding about Social Media’s use as a more direct communication tool with his audience. It was also found that successful communication is not directly proportional to the volume of messages on Twitter, but to socio-political aspects and institutional leadership that can make a difference in Social Media in combating COVID-19.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.