2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2014.03.045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Emotion word recognition: Discrete information effects first, continuous later?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

9
83
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
9
83
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Following Briesemeister et al (2014), 120 German four-to eight-letter nouns and an equal number of nonwords were presented in a 2 (happiness) ×2 (positivity) within-subjects design with 30 items per cell. In order to investigate the specific contributions of discrete emotions and affective dimensions to affective word recognition, the present study relied on two published affective norm databases, the Berlin Affective Word List-Reloaded (BAWL-R; Võ et al, 2009) and its discrete-emotion extension, the Discrete Emotion Norms for Nouns BAWL (DENN-BAWL; Briesemeister German words.…”
Section: Stimulimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Following Briesemeister et al (2014), 120 German four-to eight-letter nouns and an equal number of nonwords were presented in a 2 (happiness) ×2 (positivity) within-subjects design with 30 items per cell. In order to investigate the specific contributions of discrete emotions and affective dimensions to affective word recognition, the present study relied on two published affective norm databases, the Berlin Affective Word List-Reloaded (BAWL-R; Võ et al, 2009) and its discrete-emotion extension, the Discrete Emotion Norms for Nouns BAWL (DENN-BAWL; Briesemeister German words.…”
Section: Stimulimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent evidence supporting the hierarchical emotion theory has come from an ERP study in which participants were presented with affective words in a lexical decision task (LDT; Briesemeister, Kuchinke, & Jacobs, 2014). Word lists "high" or "low" in normative discrete emotion measures of happiness and "neutral" or "positive" on the valence dimension (positivity) were orthogonally manipulated.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Behavioral evidence has come from studies using dichotic listening, visual search, and emotional Stroop task, as well as tasks that use emotional words as distractors or lures (for a review, see Vuilleumier & Huang, 2009). In addition, ERP studies have, although inconsistently, shown that emotional words elicit a larger P1 and/or N1 than neutral words (Kissler & Herbert, 2013;Sass et al, 2010;Wang, Zhu, Bastiaansen, Hagoort, & Yang, 2013;Zhang et al, 2014; but see Bayer, Sommer, & Schacht, 2012;Briesemeister, Kuchinke, & Jacobs, 2014;Fritsch & Kuchinke, 2013;Hinojosa, Méndez-Bértolo, & Pozo, 2012;Scott, O'Donnell, Leuthold, & Sereno, 2009), reflecting automatic allocation of attentional resources to emotional words. Since the early P1 and N1 effects seem to precede lexical-semantic access (Dien, 2009), two explanations have been proposed to account for such rapid ERP effects.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%