2023
DOI: 10.1111/jcal.12785
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Emotion regulation, e‐learning readiness, technology usage status, in‐class smartphone cyberloafing, and smartphone addiction in the time of COVID‐19 pandemic

Abstract: BackgroundThe COVID‐19 pandemic has spread quickly, e‐learning became compulsory and disseminated throughout the world. During the pandemic, smartphones are frequently used to access e‐learning content, but connecting to technological tools increased the risk of cyberloafing during e‐courses. Currently, there are a limited number of studies on how e‐learning will evolve under compulsory conditions.ObjectivesThis study aimed to investigate the relationship between emotion regulation, e‐learning readiness, techn… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 93 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mihelič et al (2023) and Tarik et al (2023) underscore that cyberloafing can seriously hamper students' focus, information retention, and engagement, thereby compromising meaningful learning. This assertion is further bolstered by Gökçearslan et al (2023) and Cook (2017), who have drawn correlations between high levels of cyberloafing and diminished academic performance. In contrast, some researchers argue for a more nuanced understanding of the cyberloafing-academic performance link.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Mihelič et al (2023) and Tarik et al (2023) underscore that cyberloafing can seriously hamper students' focus, information retention, and engagement, thereby compromising meaningful learning. This assertion is further bolstered by Gökçearslan et al (2023) and Cook (2017), who have drawn correlations between high levels of cyberloafing and diminished academic performance. In contrast, some researchers argue for a more nuanced understanding of the cyberloafing-academic performance link.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Initially identified as a form of production deviant behavior in the workplace, cyberloafing involves using the internet for non-work-related activities during designated working times (Lim et al, 2002). The definition has since been broadened to include all usage of devices during learning periods, representing a deviation from focused academic activities (Gökçearslan et al, 2023). Despite contextual differences, cyberloafing at work and school share the core similarity of time wastage.…”
Section: Literature Review Cyberloafingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Mendoza et al [69], Giunchiglia et al [70], and Pérez-Juárez et al [71] argued that excessive smartphone use could be a source of distraction, adversely affecting learning. Other studies, such as Gökçearslan et al [72] and Montag and Elhai [73], argue that students who are permitted to keep their smartphones in the classroom are continuously distracted by text messages and other non-academic issues. In addition, students looking at their smartphones during classroom time have shorter attention spans.…”
Section: Technological Inclusion: Effect On Education Disparitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, existing studies have not reached a consensus on whether education-oriented IU will lead to Internet addiction. Some scholars contend that the proliferation of online education has increased the duration of students’ Internet use, which may further lead to Internet addiction ( 30 ), while others believe that education-oriented IU is more likely to result in cyberloafing than direct Internet addiction ( 31 ). Different from previous research, the current research aims to take both the duration and forms of Internet use into consideration, and examine their relationship between Internet use and Internet addiction among Chinese youth and adolescents.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%