2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2009.04.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Emotion regulation and cortisol reactivity to a social-evaluative speech task

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

12
112
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 155 publications
(126 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
12
112
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Although there are various strategies that adolescents may use to regulate emotions, in the present study we focused on two commonly used measures of late adolescent and adult emotion regulation: expressive suppression and cognitive reappraisal (Gross, 1998(Gross, , 2002 that have been reliably measured in early to mid-adolescence (Gullone, Hughes, King, & Tonge, 2010;Watson, 2007). Suppression refers to efforts to actively control emotional expressivity and is associated with negative social consequences (Butler et al, 2003), negative emotionality (Butler, Lee, & Gross, 2007), depressive symptoms (Flynn, Hollenstein, & Mackey, 2010;Gross & John, 2003), greater SNS activity (Lam, Dickerson, Zoccola, & Zaldivar, 2009), and less success in actually regulating emotions (Butler et al, 2003). The strategy of reappraisal includes thinking about a situation in different ways to reduce negative emotional reactivity and is associated with better adjustment and well-being (Flynn et al, 2010;Gross & John, 2003).…”
Section: The Present Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there are various strategies that adolescents may use to regulate emotions, in the present study we focused on two commonly used measures of late adolescent and adult emotion regulation: expressive suppression and cognitive reappraisal (Gross, 1998(Gross, , 2002 that have been reliably measured in early to mid-adolescence (Gullone, Hughes, King, & Tonge, 2010;Watson, 2007). Suppression refers to efforts to actively control emotional expressivity and is associated with negative social consequences (Butler et al, 2003), negative emotionality (Butler, Lee, & Gross, 2007), depressive symptoms (Flynn, Hollenstein, & Mackey, 2010;Gross & John, 2003), greater SNS activity (Lam, Dickerson, Zoccola, & Zaldivar, 2009), and less success in actually regulating emotions (Butler et al, 2003). The strategy of reappraisal includes thinking about a situation in different ways to reduce negative emotional reactivity and is associated with better adjustment and well-being (Flynn et al, 2010;Gross & John, 2003).…”
Section: The Present Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…dispositional emotion regulation; Mohiyeddini, 2005; see also Wirtz et al, 2006). What is more, it has been reported that emotion regulation is linked to psychological and physiological functioning (Lam, Dickerson, Zoccola, & Zaldivar, 2009). However, potential mediating effects of emotion regulation processes on the association between listening to music and physiological and psychological functioning have not been described in the literature so far.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reappraisal does not always successfully reduce measures of negative emotion (Lam, Dickerson, Zoccola & Zaldivar, 2009) and could be due to copings strategies implemented. It would suggest people who employ problem-focused coping strategies have increased resilience and less emotional impact of the traumatic event.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%