2022
DOI: 10.32604/iasc.2022.020849
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Emotion Recognition with Short-Period Physiological Signals Using Bimodal Sparse Autoencoders

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, we compared the performance of CNNs and models that combined a stacked autoencoder and a CNN or LSTM. Finally, the performance of the bimodal stacked sparse autoencoder [32] was compared. Table 5 summarizes the experimental results of emotion recognition.…”
Section: Classification Results On the Edpe Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, we compared the performance of CNNs and models that combined a stacked autoencoder and a CNN or LSTM. Finally, the performance of the bimodal stacked sparse autoencoder [32] was compared. Table 5 summarizes the experimental results of emotion recognition.…”
Section: Classification Results On the Edpe Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We required a dataset containing PPG and EMG signals; thus, among the available datasets, we chose the DEAP dataset [12]. Moreover, we created a dataset, EDPE, for more granular emotions (as used in a previous study [32]).…”
Section: Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A self-supervised method for reliably obtaining representations from distinct physiological inputs was presented by Dissanayake et al [8]. A bimodal structure was employed by Lee et al [9] to enhance recognition performance, with noteworthy outcomes in the classi cation of arousal and valence. In order to extract emotion-related information from EEG data, Pusarla et al [10] created a deep learning-based system that performed better than earlier methods.…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To verify the effectiveness of the UGAN-GRUD model, three publicly available e-health datasets, Health-care [3], Perf-DS1 [26][27][28] and Perf-DS2 [28] were used. Those electronic medical records are the data on human physiological indicators [3,28].…”
Section: Experimental Datasets and Baseline Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%