2013
DOI: 10.1167/13.9.589
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Emotion recognition (sometimes) depends on horizontal orientations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Masking horizontal orientation information with noise also impairs face recognition performance relative to the masking of other orientation sub‐bands (Pachai, Sekuler, & Bennett, ), and demonstrates the lower efficiency of face recognition in the absence of this information. Besides face identification/discrimination, horizontal orientation information also proves superior than other orientation sub‐bands for emotion recognition (Huynh & Balas, ), an effect that is specific to faces and does not generalize to body stimuli (Balas & Huynh, ). While the horizontal orientation advantage does not extend to all aspects of face perception (gaze perception, for example, does not appear to selectively depend on horizontal information; Goffaux and Okamoto‐Barth, ), this information bias is nonetheless quite robust and applies to a broad class of judgments, demonstrating that key representations for processing faces recruit horizontal information to a disproportionate degree.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Masking horizontal orientation information with noise also impairs face recognition performance relative to the masking of other orientation sub‐bands (Pachai, Sekuler, & Bennett, ), and demonstrates the lower efficiency of face recognition in the absence of this information. Besides face identification/discrimination, horizontal orientation information also proves superior than other orientation sub‐bands for emotion recognition (Huynh & Balas, ), an effect that is specific to faces and does not generalize to body stimuli (Balas & Huynh, ). While the horizontal orientation advantage does not extend to all aspects of face perception (gaze perception, for example, does not appear to selectively depend on horizontal information; Goffaux and Okamoto‐Barth, ), this information bias is nonetheless quite robust and applies to a broad class of judgments, demonstrating that key representations for processing faces recruit horizontal information to a disproportionate degree.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To judge relative trustworthiness from face images, horizontal information appears to be both necessary and sufficient. This outcome can be easily understood via previous results suggesting both that perceived trustworthiness is affected by subtle variation in emotional expression in neutral faces (Engell, Todorov, & Haxby, 2010;Said, Sebe & Todorov, 2009) and that successful decoding of emotional expressions depends on horizontal orientation energy (Huynh & Balas, 2014;Yu, Chai & Chung, 2011). To the extent that judging trustworthiness amounts to evaluating the valence of facial expressions, it is not surprising to find a common reliance on the same subset of visual features for both judgments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…These results demonstrate that the visual information that is used for social evaluation in face images depends critically on the specific trait that observers are trying to evaluate. We predicted at the outset that all three judgments would lead to a pattern of behavior consistent with the preferential use of horizontal orientation information for face identification (Dakin & Watt, 2009), emotion recognition (Huynh & Balas, 2014), and other tasks (Goffaux & Dakin, 2010), but found instead that the removal of horizontal or vertical image structure had different consequences for different tasks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…These results suggest that particular diagnostic features of a corresponding facial expression make people more accurate at recognising facial expressions, in that people are biased to happy faces when displayed with an open rather than closed mouth, and to sad and neutral faces when displayed with closed rather than open mouths. Huynh and Balas () observed that an open mouth plays a vital role especially in happy faces due to the association between teeth and a happy expression. The visibility of the teeth affects the judgment of a distinct facial expression.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect of emotional recognition not only arises from the observer (e.g., their bodily state), but also from objective features of the sender (e.g., their facial expression). Emotional recognition largely relies on the salient perceptual features of the facial expression stimuli (e.g., mouth openness: open vs. closed; Huynh & Balas, ). In developmental research, perceptual differences based on a salient facial feature (e.g., the toothiness of a smile) may bias responses for the discrimination of a happiness expression in 7‐month‐old infants (Kestenbaum & Nelson, ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%