“…Similarly, ToM studies in schizotypy are mixed (Barragan, Laurens, Navarro, & Obiols, 2011;Bedwell et al, 2014;Canli, Ozdemir, & Kocak, 2015;Deptula & Bedwell, 2015;Fernyhough, Jones, Whittle, Waterhouse, & Bentall, 2008;Fyfe, Williams, Mason, & Pickup, 2008;Gooding & Pflum, 2011;Henry, Bailey, & Rendell, 2008;Jahshan & Sergi, 2007;Langdon & Coltheart, 1999;McCleery et al, 2012;Modinos, Renken, Shamay-Tsoory, Ormel, & Aleman, 2010;Monestès, Villatte, Moore, Yon, & Loas, 2008;Morrison, Brown, & Cohen, 2013;Pflum, Gooding, & White, 2013;Pickup, 2006;Villatte, Monestès, McHugh, Freixa i Baqué, & Loas, 2008). These inconsistent findings might be partially attributable to the multifaceted nature of ToM, heterogeneous demands of tasks used across studies, and heterogeneous measurement of schizotypy (Bora, Yücel, & Pantelis, 2009;Pinkham et al, 2014;Shamay-Tsoory et al, 2007;Vaskinn, Andersson, Østefjells, Andreassen, & Sundet, 2018). For example, the Reading the Mind in the Eyes test (Baron- Cohen, Wheelwright, Hill, Raste, & Plumb, 2001) requires participants to make inferences about others' emotions after viewing photos of eyes, whereas the Hinting Task (Corcoran, Mercer, & Frith, 1995) requires participants to make inferences about others' intentions following indirect speech.…”