2021
DOI: 10.1101/2021.09.20.461138
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Emotion Down- and Up-Regulation Act on Spatially Distinct Brain Areas: Interoceptive Regions to Calm Down and Other Affective Regions to Amp Up

Abstract: Prior studies on emotion regulation identified a set of brain regions specialized for generating and controlling affect. Researchers generally agree that when up- and down-regulating emotion, control regions in the prefrontal cortex turn up or down activity in affect-generating areas. However, the assumption that turning up and down emotions produces opposite effects in the same affect-generating regions is untested. We call this assumption the 'affective dial hypothesis.' Our study tested this hypothesis by e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 45 publications
0
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…greater disease severity), which was mediated by increased (possibly compensatory) functional MRI activation in anterior cingulate cortex, a region involved in autonomic and emotion regulation and interoception. 42 , 43 The observed differences in logHRV slopes between agitated and non-agitated individuals in our study may at least partly explain the inconsistent findings of HRV in Alzheimer’s disease from previous studies. 16 …”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 44%
“…greater disease severity), which was mediated by increased (possibly compensatory) functional MRI activation in anterior cingulate cortex, a region involved in autonomic and emotion regulation and interoception. 42 , 43 The observed differences in logHRV slopes between agitated and non-agitated individuals in our study may at least partly explain the inconsistent findings of HRV in Alzheimer’s disease from previous studies. 16 …”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 44%