2009
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-10-50
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

EMMA 2 – A MAGE-compliant system for the collaborative analysis and integration of microarray data

Abstract: Background: Understanding transcriptional regulation by genome-wide microarray studies can contribute to unravel complex relationships between genes. Attempts to standardize the annotation of microarray data include the Minimum Information About a Microarray Experiment (MIAME) recommendations, the MAGE-ML format for data interchange, and the use of controlled vocabularies or ontologies. The existing software systems for microarray data analysis implement the mentioned standards only partially and are often har… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
56
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To minimize the number of false-positive signals, the data were stringently filtered to obtain genes with at least six statistically significant values out of eight technical replicates present on the two microarrays along with an error probability of less than 5% for the Student t test. Normalization of the hybridization data by the Lowess function and t test statistics was accomplished by use of the EMMA 2.2 software package (25,26). Genes with a statistical significance of a P value of Յ0.05, a changed transcript abundance of Ϯ2 (M Ն 1 or M Յ Ϫ1), and a minimal signal intensity of an A value of Ն9 (negative controls) were regarded as differentially expressed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To minimize the number of false-positive signals, the data were stringently filtered to obtain genes with at least six statistically significant values out of eight technical replicates present on the two microarrays along with an error probability of less than 5% for the Student t test. Normalization of the hybridization data by the Lowess function and t test statistics was accomplished by use of the EMMA 2.2 software package (25,26). Genes with a statistical significance of a P value of Յ0.05, a changed transcript abundance of Ϯ2 (M Ն 1 or M Յ Ϫ1), and a minimal signal intensity of an A value of Ն9 (negative controls) were regarded as differentially expressed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there are conflicts between the aims of designing unique probes for all genes including those with sequence similarities and the necessity of obtaining oligonucleotides with physical properties useful for hybridization procedures. Unfavourable trade-offs in these fields are often unavoidable [129]. The underlying drawbacks of microarray design have been reduced by technological progress but not fundamentally eliminated, despite advancements in design and data analysis.…”
Section: Validation and Augmentation Of Genome Annotations Based On Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite being a stand-alone application, it is able to communicate with the well-established genome annotation software GenDB (c) [77], which can be complemented with SAMS for the analysis of shorter DNA sequence data [269]. Specialized tools facilitate the genome-based interpretation of microarray-based transcriptome data (d; EMMA; [129]), proteome data (e; QuPE; [172]), and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS)-based metabolome data (f; MeltDB; [181]). Recently, in addition, the ALLocator software (g) became available for liquid chromatography (LC)-MS-based metabolite analyses [184], as well as applications for enhanced data visualization (h; ProMeTra; [172]) and for the automated generation of metabolic networks in Systems Biology Markup Language (SBML) format (i; CARMEN; [199]).…”
Section: Genomic Basicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Normalization and t-statistics were carried out using the EMMA2.8.2 microarray data analysis software developed at the Bioinformatics Resource Facility, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University [66]. Genes were classified as differentially expressed with P <0.05 and M >1 or M <À1 (at least a twofold difference).…”
Section: Analysis Of Sam Levelsmentioning
confidence: 99%