1997
DOI: 10.1006/jeem.1997.0977
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Emissions Trading with Shares and Coupons when Control over Discharges Is Uncertain

Abstract: Two important decisions in designing markets for tradable emissions permits are whether to allow banking and whether to allow trading in entitlements to future permits Banking is predicted to reduce price instability when firms trade in a reconciliation market after the quantity of emissions has been determined Tradable entitlements ("shares") are a common feature in proposals for emissions trading in Canada We conduct a laboratory experiment to I INTRODUCTIONTwo important decisions in designing markets for t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
45
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Permit banking in laboratory experiments have been motivated by a variety of reasons. Cason and Gangadharan's (2006) experiments involved stochastic emissions, while subjects in Godby et al (1997) were motivated by both stochastic emissions and a reduction in the permit supply. Cason et al (1999) focused solely on banking motivated by a reduction in the permit supply as we do.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Permit banking in laboratory experiments have been motivated by a variety of reasons. Cason and Gangadharan's (2006) experiments involved stochastic emissions, while subjects in Godby et al (1997) were motivated by both stochastic emissions and a reduction in the permit supply. Cason et al (1999) focused solely on banking motivated by a reduction in the permit supply as we do.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The calculator did not reveal optimal production or permit trading behavior. This is like the planner used by Godby et al (1997). At the end of each period, subjects were given a summary of their production earnings, revenue or expenditures from permit trades, any penalties for the period, and a running tally of their cumulative cash balance.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 We have already discussed the marginal impacts of a change in some element of ex k on a k-type firm's choices. We have also noted that a firm's choice of emissions is independent of the monitoring and enforcement effort applied to it (Result 1); therefore, its choice of violation is affected by monitoring and enforcement only through induced changes in the number of permits it chooses to hold.…”
Section: A K-type Firm's Choice Of Violation Including Whether It Ismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fortunately some resolution of this dilemma seems possible. One solution is to define the entitlement in terms of a share of a target aggregate emission level, rather than as a constant emission level (Godby et al, 1997). This share, the entitlement, would remain constant over time, though the aggregate target to which it is applied could be adjusted by a predetermined process as circumstances merit.…”
Section: Environment and Development Economics 403mentioning
confidence: 99%