2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2005.08.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Emissions and spatial variability of N2O, N2 and nitrous oxide mole fraction at the field scale, revealed with 15N isotopic techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
92
3
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 175 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
11
92
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These are considered to be effective in reducing the masking effects of soil temperature and water conditions on N 2 O and CO 2 production, enabling the effects of other soil factors to be determined (Gödde and Conrad 2000). The reason for the largest N 2 O production in orchard soils might be the high initial mineral N levels according to chronic fertilizer application in the fields, which is considered a key factor influencing N 2 O emissions (Robertson et al 2000;Mathieu et al 2006). Land use types may directly alter soil properties, especially the biological properties (Merino et al 2004), and thus indirectly affect GHG emission (Ishizuka et al 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These are considered to be effective in reducing the masking effects of soil temperature and water conditions on N 2 O and CO 2 production, enabling the effects of other soil factors to be determined (Gödde and Conrad 2000). The reason for the largest N 2 O production in orchard soils might be the high initial mineral N levels according to chronic fertilizer application in the fields, which is considered a key factor influencing N 2 O emissions (Robertson et al 2000;Mathieu et al 2006). Land use types may directly alter soil properties, especially the biological properties (Merino et al 2004), and thus indirectly affect GHG emission (Ishizuka et al 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was assumed that the chemical and biological reactions that cause N 2 O emissions take place in a small soil area; large plots would not bring additional benefit because of the high spatial variability of N 2 O emissions in soils (Mathieu et al, 2006). The experiment followed a complete randomized design with four replications, resulting in 20 plots and 20 chambers.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the final product of denitrification is the benign atmospheric gas N 2 , this process is not always completed and variable amounts of N 2 O, a potent greenhouse gas (GHG), can be produced. Physical, chemical and biological factors influence the reduction of N 2 O to N 2 (Weier et al, 1993) including soil moisture content (Davidson, 1991;Ruser et al, 2006), pH (Simek and Cooper, 2002;Cuhel et al, 2010), temperature (Bailey, 1976;Keeney et al, 1979), C supply (Parkin, 1987;Mathieu et al, 2006), soil redox conditions (Firestone and Tiedje, 1979;Tiedje, 1988) and management (Frolking et al, 1998;Liu et al, 2007).…”
Section: K L Mcgeough Et Al: the Effect Of Cattle Slurry In Combinmentioning
confidence: 99%