2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2017.07.057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Emissions and performance of diesel–natural gas dual-fuel engine operated with stoichiometric mixture

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At 80% substitution rate at low load, longer ignition delay periods resulting from more lean mixtures might produce more zones with high temperature in the cylinder compared to medium load, thereby increasing the emissions of NOx and CO2. The reduction of CO2 with the increase of substitution rate is due to the low carbon content in natural gas under the condition of constant energy input [33]. In terms of the characteristic soot emissions, with the increase of substitution rate the soot increases to a small extent at low load (see Figure 10).…”
Section: Emissions Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…At 80% substitution rate at low load, longer ignition delay periods resulting from more lean mixtures might produce more zones with high temperature in the cylinder compared to medium load, thereby increasing the emissions of NOx and CO2. The reduction of CO2 with the increase of substitution rate is due to the low carbon content in natural gas under the condition of constant energy input [33]. In terms of the characteristic soot emissions, with the increase of substitution rate the soot increases to a small extent at low load (see Figure 10).…”
Section: Emissions Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Only liquid phase properties can be measured/evaluated as it is a cold device. More details can be found in [25]. Regarding the calibration procedure itself for the case of LES spray, the outcome was found satisfactory - Figure 4 shows the comparison of a calibrated model versus the experimental data.…”
Section: Model Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Emission factors depend strongly on engines specifics and the operating conditions which largely vary in consequence of the different applications. Therefore, a broad range of emissions factors has been reported in literature (Maji et al 2008;Coppola and Quaranta 2014;Vávra et al 2017;Zheng et al 2019). In order to compare SOFC to DF engine, just for a rough evaluation, we considered average values and the variability range of emissions factors of DF engine depending only by the fuel consumption that are obtained from literature data.…”
Section: Emissionsmentioning
confidence: 99%