58. Jahrestagung Der Deutschen Gesellschaft Für Nuklearmedizin 2020
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1708281
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Emission time optimisation for Ga-68-PSMA with a digital PET/CT – a phantom study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of note, additional PSF reconstruction did not provide additional value in terms of detectability. This can be largely explained by the implementation of a 4-mm Gaussian lter, producing similar PET reconstructed spatial resolutions for TOF-and TOF+PSF-reconstructed images (6.2 mm vs. 5.6 mm) [9]. In addition, under reduced statistical conditions, PET images will inevitably display higher noise [23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Of note, additional PSF reconstruction did not provide additional value in terms of detectability. This can be largely explained by the implementation of a 4-mm Gaussian lter, producing similar PET reconstructed spatial resolutions for TOF-and TOF+PSF-reconstructed images (6.2 mm vs. 5.6 mm) [9]. In addition, under reduced statistical conditions, PET images will inevitably display higher noise [23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A prior, still unpublished, phantom optimization study (simulating conditions observed for [ 68 Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 patients) by our group demonstrated that a three and a half-fold reduction of emission time per bed position did not result in any notable loss of lesion detectability and image quanti cation when using appropriate image reconstruction algorithms and reconstruction parameters [9]. These results can be projected to the use of low activity protocols, as a reduction of emission time roughly corresponds to a reduction of the administered activity by the same factor [5,10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The mean ± SD time interval between tracer injection and the rst and second PET scan time point was 58 ± 12 min 74 ± 12 min, respectively. The three and a half-fold threefold reduction of the scan time duration was based on an optimization study performed on the same PET/CT system using phantoms under conditions observed in prostate cancer imaging [10]. More precisely, it has been demonstrated that the optimized step-and-shoot emission time was approximately 60 s/bed (or about 2.1 mm/s in continuous-bed-motion table speed) in association with appropriate image reconstruction algorithms (see below).…”
Section: Image Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%