2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2016.03.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

EMGdi signal enhancement based on ICA decomposition and wavelet transform

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As a clinical signal, we can not accurately obtain its real signal, thus, SNR and PSRE are not useful to evaluate the efficient of algorithms. Clinical EMGdi is usually assessed by median frequency and total power after de-noising [13,17,18]. Total power is denoted as following…”
Section: Clinical Emgdi De-noising Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…As a clinical signal, we can not accurately obtain its real signal, thus, SNR and PSRE are not useful to evaluate the efficient of algorithms. Clinical EMGdi is usually assessed by median frequency and total power after de-noising [13,17,18]. Total power is denoted as following…”
Section: Clinical Emgdi De-noising Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in Table 2, median frequency of EMGdi processed by wavelet threshold is 138.37 Hz, and median frequency of EMGdi processed by ''inverse'' hard threshold is 108.36 Hz. In literatures [13,17,18], normal median frequency of EMGdi is in the range from 80 to 117 Hz after removing the ECG interference. Median frequency of EMGdi de-noised by ''inverse'' hard threshold is closer to normal EMGdi than wavelet threshold.…”
Section: Clinical Emgdi De-noising Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations