2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.10.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

EMG normalization method based on grade 3 of manual muscle testing: Within- and between-day reliability of normalization tasks and application to gait analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, we also calculated the linear envelope (LE) of the EMG signal, which is an intuitive processing method of EMG reflecting the muscle force level [56]. Specifically, a full-wave rectification and a lowpass filter with a cutoff frequency of 3 Hz were used to obtain the LE, as previous research has evidenced the ability of the 3 Hz cutoff frequency to provide good relations with muscle force [56][57][58][59][60].…”
Section: Data Pre-processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, we also calculated the linear envelope (LE) of the EMG signal, which is an intuitive processing method of EMG reflecting the muscle force level [56]. Specifically, a full-wave rectification and a lowpass filter with a cutoff frequency of 3 Hz were used to obtain the LE, as previous research has evidenced the ability of the 3 Hz cutoff frequency to provide good relations with muscle force [56][57][58][59][60].…”
Section: Data Pre-processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although normalization to an MVC is commonly used, because it is generally repeatable and provides a reference value that can be interpreted easily, i.e., relative to the maximum possible activation of the muscle (Bolgla and Uhl, 2007;Burden, 2010), this is not always possible and may not be the best method for some needed analyses (Hug and Tucker, 2017). Although some methods have been reported as reliable (Albertus-Kajee et al, 2011;Murley et al, 2010;Tabard-Fougere et al, 2018) and give similar values between sessions, this does not ensure that the normalized EMG amplitude value enables a valid comparison of the level of activation of a muscle(s) for a specific application or research question. It is important to consider whether the normalization method is both repeatable and valid, and suitable to answer the specific question being addressed with EMG.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, an improved understanding of the reliability of different EMG variables is warranted. Most studies examining the reliability of EMG variables have been limited to slow, controlled tasks, including gait analysis [12], isometric contractions [13,14] or isokinetic dynamometry of single-joint exercises [15,16], while few studies have analyzed the reliability of EMG variables during functional, dynamic, multi-joint exercises executing the movement at maximal intended velocity [11,[17][18][19]. In these studies, EMG was measured during jump [17][18][19] or squat exercises [11], with reliability scores showing a wide variability depending on the exercise, variable and load magnitude used.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%