2012
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0052618
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

EMG-Driven Forward-Dynamic Estimation of Muscle Force and Joint Moment about Multiple Degrees of Freedom in the Human Lower Extremity

Abstract: This work examined if currently available electromyography (EMG) driven models, that are calibrated to satisfy joint moments about one single degree of freedom (DOF), could provide the same musculotendon unit (MTU) force solution, when driven by the same input data, but calibrated about a different DOF. We then developed a novel and comprehensive EMG-driven model of the human lower extremity that used EMG signals from 16 muscle groups to drive 34 MTUs and satisfy the resulting joint moments simultaneously prod… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
350
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 263 publications
(355 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
3
350
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This inconsistency may explain why EMG-driven models may not offer a solution when several EMGs are input to the model [19]. Other authors optimized the model parameters within physiological boundaries, solving the model consistency problem and ensuring that a solution to the motion problem exists [18,20,46]. However, the optimized model probably provides little information about how the calculated solution represents the subject under study because of the typically large variability of physiological parameters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This inconsistency may explain why EMG-driven models may not offer a solution when several EMGs are input to the model [19]. Other authors optimized the model parameters within physiological boundaries, solving the model consistency problem and ensuring that a solution to the motion problem exists [18,20,46]. However, the optimized model probably provides little information about how the calculated solution represents the subject under study because of the typically large variability of physiological parameters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inverse EMG-driven models solve the muscle load-sharing problem by forcing the static optimization solution within an arbitrarily defined interval around the calculated EMGdriven muscle force to ensure that a solution to the problem exists [19]. Forward EMG-driven models use optimizationbased procedures to tune the model, so that the calculated EMG-driven muscle forces generate the desired motion of the model [18,20]. Lloyd & Besier [18] used an EMG-driven model of the knee-spanning muscles to estimate the knee torque.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The motor neuron discharges were converted into continuous neural activations using a twitch model based on a time-history dependent recursive filter and a non-linear transfer function 48 . Experimental joint angles were used as input to a multidimensional cubic B-splines set that synthetized the OpenSim subject-specific geometry of muscle-tendon units and computed their resulting length and moment arms 49,50 . Neural activations and muscletendon unit length were used to control a Hill-type muscle model and estimate instantaneous length, contraction velocity, and force in the muscle fibers, and strain and force in the series-elastic tendon within each muscle-tendon unit 49 .…”
Section: Model-based Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experimental joint angles were used as input to a multidimensional cubic B-splines set that synthetized the OpenSim subject-specific geometry of muscle-tendon units and computed their resulting length and moment arms 49,50 . Neural activations and muscletendon unit length were used to control a Hill-type muscle model and estimate instantaneous length, contraction velocity, and force in the muscle fibers, and strain and force in the series-elastic tendon within each muscle-tendon unit 49 . The computed forces were projected onto all upper extremity degrees of freedom simultaneously via the moment arms.…”
Section: Model-based Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%