2022
DOI: 10.1186/s12984-022-01019-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

EMG-driven control in lower limb prostheses: a topic-based systematic review

Abstract: Background The inability of users to directly and intuitively control their state-of-the-art commercial prosthesis contributes to a low device acceptance rate. Since Electromyography (EMG)-based control has the potential to address those inabilities, research has flourished on investigating its incorporation in microprocessor-controlled lower limb prostheses (MLLPs). However, despite the proposed benefits of doing so, there is no clear explanation regarding the absence of a commercial product, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 134 publications
(147 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While for the dry skin no gel is required to interface it with the electrode, up to now, many researchers have investigated EMG sensors and applied it to control robotic interface, these investigations can be divided into three categories: controlling prosthetic arms, remotely operated robots mainly used in medical surgeries, and the application of orthoses. (Bitzer & Van Der Smagt, 2006) controlled a four-fingered robot hand using EMG sensor inputs from 10 forearm muscles, according to (Cimolato et al, 2022) the results indicates that there is a lack of quantitative and standardized measurements among the researchers that work on EMG based bionic limbs which hinders the possibility to analyze and compare the performances of different EMG-driven controllers.…”
Section: Emg Sensor and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While for the dry skin no gel is required to interface it with the electrode, up to now, many researchers have investigated EMG sensors and applied it to control robotic interface, these investigations can be divided into three categories: controlling prosthetic arms, remotely operated robots mainly used in medical surgeries, and the application of orthoses. (Bitzer & Van Der Smagt, 2006) controlled a four-fingered robot hand using EMG sensor inputs from 10 forearm muscles, according to (Cimolato et al, 2022) the results indicates that there is a lack of quantitative and standardized measurements among the researchers that work on EMG based bionic limbs which hinders the possibility to analyze and compare the performances of different EMG-driven controllers.…”
Section: Emg Sensor and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With these methods, the recorded EMG signals are processed to provide a unique neural control to a single Hill-type actuator that phenomenologically describes whole muscle dynamics. This approach is wellestablished and implemented in automated tools (Pizzolato et al, 2015) and has had important applications, for example in human-machine interfacing (Sartori et al, 2012;Ao et al, 2017;Caggiano et al, 2022;Cimolato et al, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This technique is classified as either non-invasive, including surface electromyography (sEMG), electroencephalography (EEG), forcemyography (FMG), mechanomyography (MMG), magnetoencephalography (MEG), force sensitive resistance (FSR), and magnetomicrometry (MM), with the last one being presently developed in MIT [ 15 ], or invasive, including implanted electromyography (iEMG), myoelectric implantable recording arrays (MIRAs), electroneurography (ENG), electrocorticography (ECoG), brain–chip interfaces (BCHIs), and magnetomicrometry (MM) [ 16 ]. Among all of these techniques, sEMG is the most commonly used method for prosthesis control, which has been studied very extensively [ 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%