2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-00846-2_17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

EMG and Kinematics Assessment of Postural Responses during Balance Perturbation on a 3D Robotic Platform: Preliminary Results in Children with Hemiplegia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This method is time consuming, estimates the spatial accuracy of the load measurement across the platform and can be affected by load positioning inaccuracies. Some diagnostic modalities, like dynamic posturography [72], require the acquisition of dynamic information and a dynamic calibration to evaluate the FPs response to dynamic loads: testing procedures can involve devices devoted to handle calibrated weights either manually or mechanically. Since the manual handling of masses usually limits the dynamic characterization, the calibration systems using mechanical handling are preferable.…”
Section: Force Platforms Calibration Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method is time consuming, estimates the spatial accuracy of the load measurement across the platform and can be affected by load positioning inaccuracies. Some diagnostic modalities, like dynamic posturography [72], require the acquisition of dynamic information and a dynamic calibration to evaluate the FPs response to dynamic loads: testing procedures can involve devices devoted to handle calibrated weights either manually or mechanically. Since the manual handling of masses usually limits the dynamic characterization, the calibration systems using mechanical handling are preferable.…”
Section: Force Platforms Calibration Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dynamic posturography was performed using an electrically actuated robotic device, the RotoBit 3D , which permits arbitrary rotations -in terms of roll, pitch and yaw directions -around a fixed point. In brief, RotoBit 3D [23][24][25][26][27][28] is characterized by: a workspace of about AE108 for roll and pitch when yaw is in the range AE158, a phase delay of 18, and an amplitude error 1.5%. The RotoBit 3D was installed in the middle of a 10-m walkway of the laboratory.…”
Section: Equipmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present study we decided: (i) to use an in-house developed 3D robotic device [23][24][25][26][27][28], which could continuously change the rotation direction and which could be set at different amplitudes and frequencies; and (ii) to conduct quantitative assessments of upper body kinematics. In our first working hypothesis we sought to confirm that the presence of visual information, when healthy adults were subjected to continuous 3D perturbation, would induce a greater upper-body stabilization than that occurring when vision is absent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two assessments may provide not overlapping information, as the same movement may be generated with different combinations of the redundant muscle system. Typical examples of kinematic analysis combined with EMG measures allowed us to examine the effects of rehabilitation in hemiplegic children [ 122 ], revealing that the combined analysis can highlight the differences in the postural responses between the less-affected and more-affected sides. In patients with spasticity, biomarkers of spasticity were extracted from kinematics and EMG describing the biomechanical and neurogenic components of spasticity [ 123 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%