2003
DOI: 10.1615/critrevtherdrugcarriersyst.v20.i23.30
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Emerging Trends in Oral Delivery of Peptide and Protein Drugs

Abstract: Most peptide and protein drugs are currently used as parenteral formulations because of their poor oral bioavailability. Development of an effective oral delivery system for these macromolecular drugs requires a thorough understanding of their physicochemical properties, such as molecular weight, hydrophobicity, ionization constants, and pH stability, as well as biological barriers that restrict protein and peptide absorption from the gastrointestinal (GI) tract, including pH variability, enzymatic degradation… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
168
0
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 300 publications
(171 citation statements)
references
References 190 publications
0
168
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…9,10) Our previous study demonstrated that the apparent permeability coefficient (P app ) of exendin-4 across the Madin Darby canine kidney (MDCK) cell monolayer was approximately 1×10…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9,10) Our previous study demonstrated that the apparent permeability coefficient (P app ) of exendin-4 across the Madin Darby canine kidney (MDCK) cell monolayer was approximately 1×10…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, during the transit through the intestinal tract, they are chemically and enzymatically inactivated by the high acidity of the stomach and the presence of nutrients and secreted enzymes. Nevertheless, oral delivery is a very attractive option for administration of many proteins (30,31).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first physicochemical barrier encountered in the gastro-intestinal (GI) tract is constituted by the stomach fluid: the pH in the stomach generally ranges from pH 1.0 to 2.5 in the normal fasted state condition (Evans et al, 1988). Furthermore, the stomach fluid is rich in the enzyme pepsin that constitutes a further biochemical barrier to proteins (Mahato et al, 2003). The intestine has a more neutral pH than the stomach, generally ranging from pH 6.3 to 7.5 (Evans et al, 1988).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The intestine has a more neutral pH than the stomach, generally ranging from pH 6.3 to 7.5 (Evans et al, 1988). However, the intestinal fluid also represents a biochemical threat to the stability of therapeutic proteins, mainly due to the presence of pancreatic enzymes including trypsin and chymotrypsin (Mahato et al, 2003). In recent years, systems based on the use of nanoparticulate carriers, encapsulating and hence protecting labile proteins through their passage in the GI tract, have been investigated as possible options for the successful oral delivery of proteins (Kammona and Kiparissides, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%