2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.pacfin.2015.12.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Emerging trends in Asia-Pacific finance research: A review of recent influential publications and a research agenda

Abstract: This paper presents a systematic review of 73 influential publications among 667 journal articles published in the in the Asia-Pacific finance literature from 2011-2015. We map how the top 73 publications are related in terms of their citation relationships and identify eight different research fields, or lines of enquiry: (1) Corporate Finance, (2) Asset Pricing, (3) Conditional Asset Pricing, (4) Research on Anomalies, (5) Market Microstructure Research, (6) Factor Models, as well as two novel research strea… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 152 publications
(89 reference statements)
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The journals commonly classified as Tier 1 Finance journals are: the Journal of Finance, the Journal of Financial Economics, the Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis and the Review of Financial Studies (Oltheten et al, 2005;Swidler and Goldreyer, 1998;Zivney and Reichenstein, 1994). This article thereby complements an earlier review (Linnenluecke et al, 2016) Finance journals over the last 50 years to identify major contributions, but also to outline knowledge gaps and future research directions that can possibly be further expanded in the Asia-Pacific context as well. The method used here to identify the most influential publications within the Tier 1 Finance journals is consistent with the earlier review for the Asia-Pacific finance journals (Linnenluecke et al, 2016) and consists of bibliographic mapping, which is an established approach for determining which publications are important within a field of research (as measured by citation counts), and how they are interrelated 1 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The journals commonly classified as Tier 1 Finance journals are: the Journal of Finance, the Journal of Financial Economics, the Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis and the Review of Financial Studies (Oltheten et al, 2005;Swidler and Goldreyer, 1998;Zivney and Reichenstein, 1994). This article thereby complements an earlier review (Linnenluecke et al, 2016) Finance journals over the last 50 years to identify major contributions, but also to outline knowledge gaps and future research directions that can possibly be further expanded in the Asia-Pacific context as well. The method used here to identify the most influential publications within the Tier 1 Finance journals is consistent with the earlier review for the Asia-Pacific finance journals (Linnenluecke et al, 2016) and consists of bibliographic mapping, which is an established approach for determining which publications are important within a field of research (as measured by citation counts), and how they are interrelated 1 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Studies include the effect of directors with foreign experience on Chinese firm performance (Giannetti et al, 2015), the effect of succession tax on firm investment in Greece (Tsoutsoura, 2015), the effect on markets of access to capital in Mexico (Bruhn and Love, 2014), bribe payments and innovation across 57 developing countries (Ayyagari et al, 2014), the effects of government-owned banks on markets and firm performance across 34 countries (Carvalho, 2014) and the portfolio benefits of positive skewness in emerging market returns (Ghysels et al, 2016). This trend in the Tier 1 finance journals is also reflected in the Asia-Pacific research conversation Alqahtani et al (2016) existing research findings to all markets (Linnenluecke et al, 2016).…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 3 more Smart Citations