2022
DOI: 10.3390/medsci10010006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Emerging Tools to Capture Self-Reported Acute and Chronic Pain Outcome in Children and Adolescents: A Literature Review

Abstract: The advancement of digital health provides strategic and cost-effective opportunities for the progression of health care in children and adolescents. It is important for clinicians to be aware of the potential of emerging pain outcome measures and employ evidence-based tools capable of reliably tracking acute and chronic pain over time. The main emerging pain outcome measures for children and adolescents were examined. Overall, seven main texts and their corresponding digital health technologies were included … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
3

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
4
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Advances in digital health have enabled emerging application of mHealth tools in pain management of children and adolescents by capturing real-time pain-related data, reducing recall bias, and improving responsiveness of health professionals [ 27 ]. The findings from a recent meta-analysis revealed a strong correlation between paper methods and electronic capture of pain-related outcomes with respect to completeness of patient-reported data collection, score equivalency, ease of use, and acceptability supporting their use in the clinical setting and in interventional research [ 1 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Advances in digital health have enabled emerging application of mHealth tools in pain management of children and adolescents by capturing real-time pain-related data, reducing recall bias, and improving responsiveness of health professionals [ 27 ]. The findings from a recent meta-analysis revealed a strong correlation between paper methods and electronic capture of pain-related outcomes with respect to completeness of patient-reported data collection, score equivalency, ease of use, and acceptability supporting their use in the clinical setting and in interventional research [ 1 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In line with findings from other electronic diary studies, compliance rates were high and did not vary over the period of the study (Morren et al 2009). Previous studies using diaries for various domains, including medication adherence (Gordon et al 2007; Huber et al 2013), symptom management (Burton et al 2007; Jones et al 2019), diet and food intake (Brunner et al 2001; Given et al 2013), pain assessment (Stinson et al 2014; Turnbull et al 2022) and substance use (Acocella 2005; Stopka et al 2004) measured for shorter time periods of four–six weeks, and mostly under supervision. The results were mixed, with some reported high levels and others with moderate to lower levels of compliance, and with a gradual decline over time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Die aktuelle Multicenterstudie AlgoDARPEF zeigte, dass eine App bei einer Nutzungsrate von 70 bis 90 % ein geeignetes Instrument zur Erfassung postoperativer Schmerzen bei Kindern im durchschnittlichen Alter von 6 Jahren ist [ 31 ]. Weiterhin hatten einfache Anwendungen zur Dokumentation, beispielsweise elektronische Schmerztagebücher, deutliche Vorteile in Form einer geringeren Erinnerungsverzerrung, einer Datenmessung in Echtzeit und einer geringeren Fehlerquote im Vergleich zu papierbasierten Schmerztagebüchern [ 30 ]. Allerdings fehlen auch für diese digitalen Dokumentationsanwendungen derzeit multizentrische RCT auf internationaler Ebene sowie eine breite klinische Umsetzung [ 30 ].…”
Section: Heutige Einsatzgebieteunclassified
“…Weiterhin hatten einfache Anwendungen zur Dokumentation, beispielsweise elektronische Schmerztagebücher, deutliche Vorteile in Form einer geringeren Erinnerungsverzerrung, einer Datenmessung in Echtzeit und einer geringeren Fehlerquote im Vergleich zu papierbasierten Schmerztagebüchern [ 30 ]. Allerdings fehlen auch für diese digitalen Dokumentationsanwendungen derzeit multizentrische RCT auf internationaler Ebene sowie eine breite klinische Umsetzung [ 30 ].…”
Section: Heutige Einsatzgebieteunclassified