2019
DOI: 10.1080/14787210.2019.1635010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Emerging strategies for the noninvasive diagnosis of nosocomial pneumonia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 94 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All patients were diagnosed as pulmonary infection judged by the board-certified physician on the basis of clinical manifestations and imaging examination results. 59 , 60 mNGS analysis was ordered as clinically indicated by the treating physician of patients, and informed consent was obtained from each included patient. Total 504 clinical specimens from the 452 patients were included, including Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF, n = 284), sputum (n = 97), peripheral blood (PB, n = 97), cerebrospinal fluid (CSF, n = 14), pus (n = 3), pleural fluid (PF, n = 5) and lung biopsy tissue (n = 4).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All patients were diagnosed as pulmonary infection judged by the board-certified physician on the basis of clinical manifestations and imaging examination results. 59 , 60 mNGS analysis was ordered as clinically indicated by the treating physician of patients, and informed consent was obtained from each included patient. Total 504 clinical specimens from the 452 patients were included, including Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF, n = 284), sputum (n = 97), peripheral blood (PB, n = 97), cerebrospinal fluid (CSF, n = 14), pus (n = 3), pleural fluid (PF, n = 5) and lung biopsy tissue (n = 4).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A good example of the impact of RDTs on healthcare-associated infections is the integration of novel and rapid diagnostics for resistance phenotyping in patients with hospital- and ventilator-acquired pneumonia (HAP and VAP) as it can potentially significantly improve outcomes. 49 , 77 HAP is still a serious infection and an important cause of morbidity and mortality. 49 In one study, the respiFISH ® HAP Gram (−) Panel using fluorescence-DNA molecular beacons (Miacom Diagnostics) shortened identification time by 1 working day (species-level identification within 30 min) with sensitivity and specificity of 94.3% and 87.3%, respectively, relative to standard culture methods.…”
Section: The Impact Of Rdts On Patient Outcomes In Healthcare-associa...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…51 For VAP, it provides rapid identification of pathogens and main resistance mechanisms. 52,53 In cohort studies, the use of molecular methods possessed 80 to 90% of sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing responsible bacteria and resistance mechanisms. It would have led to antibiotic changes in twothirds of the patients including an earlier adequate therapy in one-fifth of the cases and a shift to a narrower spectrum antibiotic therapy in more than one-third of the cases.…”
Section: Impact On Treatment Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%