2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2007.10.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Emerging scholarship in the geographies of disability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
23
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…One is focused on impairment and disability, and mobility in these contexts, and the challenges facing and (non)acceptance of individuals affected (Butler et al, 1999;Gleeson, 1999;Crooks et al, 2008). The particular ageing focus in this literature includes, for example, the range and scope of older peoples' mobility (Meyer et al, 1985;Schwanen et al, 2010), their unique urban and rural challenges (Mattson 2010) and policy implications (Mercado et al 2010).…”
Section: Current Engagements With Human Movements: Key Empirical Themesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One is focused on impairment and disability, and mobility in these contexts, and the challenges facing and (non)acceptance of individuals affected (Butler et al, 1999;Gleeson, 1999;Crooks et al, 2008). The particular ageing focus in this literature includes, for example, the range and scope of older peoples' mobility (Meyer et al, 1985;Schwanen et al, 2010), their unique urban and rural challenges (Mattson 2010) and policy implications (Mercado et al 2010).…”
Section: Current Engagements With Human Movements: Key Empirical Themesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 引言 本文将非表征理论引入现有理论工具之中, 这 将是对当前老龄化地理学在概念、 理论和实证方面 的 有 益 补 充 (Andrews et al, 2007(Andrews et al, , 2009(Andrews et al, , 2013Golant, 2003;Hopkins et al, 2007;Skinner et al, 2015 (Boyle, 2004;Norman et al, 2005)。在此方面老龄化 研究的长期特别关注点是老年人的迁移目的地、 动 机、 决策过程和迁移经历, 以及对老龄化服务政策 的 影 响 (Wiseman et al, 1979;Warnes et al, 1984;Bentham, 1988;Joseph et al, 1991;Glaser et al, 1998;King et al, 2000;Silveira et al, 2001;Moore et al, 2004;Oliver, 2007)。事实上, 这些研究并不关注 长距离迁移行为本身, 而关注在总体和宏观尺度上 已经完成的(过去的)迁移活动的状况、 影响和结 果。近年来, 对时空尺度上人类生命历程所起作用 和迁移的批判性思考和研究已有所增加。这些研 收稿日期: 2015-12; 修订日期: 2015-12。 作者简介: Gavin J. ANDREWS, 男, 加拿大人, 副教授, 主要从事护理学和心理学的研究, E-mail: g.andrews@utoronto.ca。 第 12 期 Gavin J. ANDREWS 等:老年人移动构成的时空 究对生命的 "历程" 在微观尺度上的多次迁移和迁 移的意义更为敏感 (Bailey, 2009;Jarvis et al, 2011;Schwanen et al, 2012)。 (2) 基于体能活动的观点而迅速发展的新兴多 学 科 交 叉 研 究 (Witten et al, 2008;Matthews et al, 2009), 尤其是 "可步行性" 概念的提出及相关研究 已成为当前研究热点。例如, 该方面的研究已经特 别关注到可步行城市环境的营造和形式 (Ewing et al, 2009;Gehl, 2010 (3) 基于活动是健康的关联因素的认识, 探讨 健康和社会照护服务者与需求者之间的空间距 离。这些研究也归属健康地理学关于 "可达性及其 使用行为" 的研究领域 (Joseph et al, 1984); 通常强 调服务使用行为的距离衰减效应(随着距离的增 加, 对服务的使用频率下降), 及其对健康所产生的 影响。对老年人口相关的研究, 不仅考虑服务的使 用行为, 也关注 "非行动" 因素, 包括老年人住址与 服务设施、 居住距离较远的子女和其他照护者的邻 近度 (Joseph et al, 1998;Nemet et al, 2000) 此外, 在社会地理和健康地理的研究中, 另有 3 个研究领域通过以定性方法为主导的途径, 对人类 移动进行了更为直接和更具批判性的研究。第一 个领域主要关注损伤、 残疾及其相应情况下的移动 性, 以及受损个体因此所面临的挑战和社会接纳 (Butler et al, 1999;Gleeson, 1999;Crooks et al, 2008)。该领域的研究焦点在于老年人的移动空间 与范围 (Meyer et al, 1985;Schwanen et al, 2010)、 城 市和农村所面临的不同挑战 …”
unclassified
“…Na presente pesquisa, a Síndrome de Down foi abordada por meio da perspectiva sociomédica (Crooks, Dorn;Wilton, 2008), ou seja, foram consideradas, além das limitações físicas e cognitivas dos indivíduos Down, também e, principalmente, as questões decorrentes da visão que a sociedade tem dessas pessoas. No mesmo sentido, Manley (1996) alerta que as principais barreiras que impedem a completa participação de PcD na vida em comunidade são criadas pela própria sociedade.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…This paper responds to this call in what follows, exploring how everyday soundscapes can contribute to micro--geographies of embodied disability (Imrie & Edwards, 2007) amongst people living with Ménière's disease; a chronic, progressive, distressing vestibular disorder . In so doing, it moves beyond polarised biomedical or social models of disability, building instead on social relational models (Thomas, 2004) that recognise disability as the product of dynamic, embodied interactions occurring within specific sensory, material, social and cultural assemblages at particular times and for certain individuals/groups (Chouinard, Hall, & Wilton, 2010;Crooks, Dorn, & Wilton, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%