Emerging Scholar Best Article Award, 2013

Levesque, Roger J. R.

doi:10.1007/s10964-013-0028-0

Cited by 8 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This is similar to prior years (see Levesque 2011Levesque , 2012Levesque , 2013Levesque , 2014Levesque , 2015a. Unlike prior years, however, there appears to be much less variation in the range of topics that emerged.…”

supporting

confidence: 61%

Emerging Scholar Best Article Award, 2016

Levesque

2016

J Youth Adolescence

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

supporting

confidence: 61%

Emerging Scholar Best Article Award, 2016

Levesque

2016

J Youth Adolescence

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…In addition, this journal led to the development of another, Adolescent Research Review, dedicated to reviewing existing research (see Levesque 2016a) and encourages the field to better evaluate itself Levesque (2016b). And, this journal has a history of supporting emerging scholars who frequently rely on their mentors' data or large, curated data sets, as illustrated by nominees and recipients of this journal's annual emerging scholar awards (see, e.g., Levesque 2016cLevesque , 2015.…”

Section: Rationales For Not Compelling Authors To Share Their Datamentioning

confidence: 99%

Data Sharing Mandates, Developmental Science, and Responsibly Supporting Authors

Levesque

2017

J Youth Adolescence

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Data sharing has come of age. Long expected as a professional courtesy but rarely honored, data sharing is now highlighted in codes of ethics, supported by research communities, required by leading funding organizations, and variously encouraged and mandated by journals and even publishers. These developments reveal how sharing generates many benefits, all of which go to the integrity of the scientific process. Yet, sharing remains a complex phenomenon. This Editorial explains the journal's response to the publisher's mandate to establish an appropriate data sharing policy for the Journal of Youth and Adolescence. It describes the need to balance the benefits of sharing with its costs for authors publishing in multidisciplinary, developmental science journals like this one. For this journal and at this time, that balance leads us to err on the side of caution, which means supporting those who created their data and not coercing public sharing as a condition for publishing. This approach recognizes authors' reliance on a wide variety of data, the needs of differentially situated authors, the requirements of robust peer review, and the potential harms that can come from editors' unilateral sharing mandates.

show abstract

“…The selection of articles for the award involves a two-step process, with the first round involving the selection of the strongest articles from each issue and the second round involving another group of editors who rank the selected articles. As in prior years (see Levesque 2011Levesque , 2012Levesque , 2013Levesque , 2014, the process resulted in a pool of very impressive articles. Unlike prior years, the initial round resulted in having one of the journal issues creating a tie between two authors, Madan et al (2014) and Young (2014).…”

mentioning

confidence: 94%