2020
DOI: 10.3102/0091732x20903309
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Emerging Perspectives on the Co-Construction of Power and Learning in the Learning Sciences, Mathematics Education, and Science Education

Abstract: In this chapter, we examine a significant shift in research in the learning sciences, mathematics education, and science education that increasingly attends to the co-construction of power and learning. We review articles in these fields that embody a new sense of theoretical and methodological possibilities and dilemmas, brewing at the intersections of critical social theory and the methodological approaches of interaction analysis and microgenetic analysis. We organize our review into three thematic categori… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We then queried these articles using a connected learning lens to identify connected and creative experiences and theorize around how connected arts learning can support more equitable experiences, especially for non-dominant youth, by incorporating culture and creativity through youth interest and voice, drawing on supportive relationships to build youth networks, and creating inroads to future opportunities. To do so, we categorized/coded each of the articles (Jesson et al, 2011; e.g., Philip & Gupta, 2020) according to the connected learning framework. Generating themes in concert with reviewing articles was an iterative process.…”
Section: Literature Selection and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We then queried these articles using a connected learning lens to identify connected and creative experiences and theorize around how connected arts learning can support more equitable experiences, especially for non-dominant youth, by incorporating culture and creativity through youth interest and voice, drawing on supportive relationships to build youth networks, and creating inroads to future opportunities. To do so, we categorized/coded each of the articles (Jesson et al, 2011; e.g., Philip & Gupta, 2020) according to the connected learning framework. Generating themes in concert with reviewing articles was an iterative process.…”
Section: Literature Selection and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This requires pedagogical consideration of individual experiences and previous knowledge, as engaged with novel ideas and activities (Johnson, 2009;Pardjono, 2016;Sawyer, 2005). Rather than being static and declarative, knowledge is derived from an individual's interactions with the world, emerging through communication with others in communal settings (Ahn and Class, 2011;Biddle et al, 1997;Philip and Gupta, 2020).…”
Section: Teaching and Learning With Constructivismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to fundamental shifts in our field that have, for example, reframed the learning of mathematics from symbolic manipulation to "modifying and extending one's discourse" (Sfard, 2007), our emergent theories of learning need to boldly co-emerge through commitments of justice and solidarity with endarkened people. Analogous to the discursive turn in the learning of disciplines, justice and solidarity through a contrapuntal lens are not simply external relational aspirations; our approaches to understanding learning must take historical and contemporary processes of imperialism into account and allow us to newly and imaginatively conceive of solidarity as co-constructing the disciplines themselves in fundamentally new ways (Philip & Gupta, 2020).…”
Section: Theories Of Learning In Computing Education As Theories Of Smentioning
confidence: 99%