2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.futures.2015.07.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Emerging pathways for critical futures research: Changing contexts and impacts of social theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
42
0
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
42
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…[13] Slaughter outlines four traditions in Future Studies (one empirical, analytical and critical, a second one which is critical, a third one which is activist, and a fourth one which is multicultural. [14] Instead, Ahlqvist and Rhisiart Bsuggest a more schematic division between utilitarian and emancipatory paradigms.^ [15] exercises used to think of alternative futures can be systematized in different ways by means of different techniques. 5 In general, Future Studies resort to intellectual devices in order to collect, process and analyze pieces of information to profit from the most suitable technique and methodology diagram available.…”
Section: Introduction: Context and Methods Of Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[13] Slaughter outlines four traditions in Future Studies (one empirical, analytical and critical, a second one which is critical, a third one which is activist, and a fourth one which is multicultural. [14] Instead, Ahlqvist and Rhisiart Bsuggest a more schematic division between utilitarian and emancipatory paradigms.^ [15] exercises used to think of alternative futures can be systematized in different ways by means of different techniques. 5 In general, Future Studies resort to intellectual devices in order to collect, process and analyze pieces of information to profit from the most suitable technique and methodology diagram available.…”
Section: Introduction: Context and Methods Of Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These tools are deconstruction, breaking apart a given text, and asking critical questions about it; genealogy, tracing a concept through its journey through various discourses; distancing, seeing future imaginaries as critiques of the present, which open new possibilities; alternative pasts and futures, questioning both given pasts and given futures; and reordering knowledge, analyzing how the prioritizing of knowledge varies "across civilization, gender, and episteme." Ahlqvist and Rhisiart (2015) propose three emancipatory pathways for participatory futuring engagements. The first pathway is the "construction of futures through sociotechnical practices," which includes the actions of identifying key future concepts, the evolution of everyday futures images, social practices creating or changing future ideas, and entities and politics that "frame, build, or change" future ideas.…”
Section: Criticalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The debate about the theoretical background of foresight and future studies has been going on for a few decades but the discipline of future studies is not that well established compared with other mainstream fields such as sociology or political science (Öner, 2010;Ahlqvista & Rhisiartb, 2015;Bell, 2002). There is, however, a range of distinctive features that distinguish this discipline from others (Bell, 2002).…”
Section: Foresight and Future Studies As A Conceptual Tool In Internamentioning
confidence: 99%