2018
DOI: 10.1186/s13104-018-3762-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Emerging of antimicrobial resistance in staphylococci isolated from clinical and food samples in Algeria

Abstract: ObjectiveThe antimicrobial resistance of staphylococci rose worldwide. In total, 96 Staphylococcus isolates from food and clinical samples were collected from two provinces in Algeria. The antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed and resistance-associated genes were detected.ResultsFifty-one strains were isolated from food samples and differentiated into 33 Staphylococcus aureus and 18 coagulase-negative staphylococci. Forty-five staphylococci were collected from hospital and community-acquired infec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

9
20
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
(70 reference statements)
9
20
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Staphylococcus aureus can colonize the skin and the anterior nares of individuals and is carried by an important proportion of the population (Ferreira et al ). As expected, and according to with many investigations, the human Staphylococcus isolates show the highest level of resistance (Madahi et al ; Safarpoor Dehkordi et al ; Achek et al ). Effectively, all the S. aureus carried nasally were resistant to fusidic acid, trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole, norfloxacine, oxacillin and Penicillin GG.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Staphylococcus aureus can colonize the skin and the anterior nares of individuals and is carried by an important proportion of the population (Ferreira et al ). As expected, and according to with many investigations, the human Staphylococcus isolates show the highest level of resistance (Madahi et al ; Safarpoor Dehkordi et al ; Achek et al ). Effectively, all the S. aureus carried nasally were resistant to fusidic acid, trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole, norfloxacine, oxacillin and Penicillin GG.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…In our study, it was noted a low correlation between phenotypic and genotypic detection of resistance to methicillin. This finding was also reported in Greece (Papadopoulos et al ), Poland (Chajecka‐Wierzchowska et al ; FijaƂkowski et al ) and Algeria (Achek et al ). According to some studies, the non‐concordance of phenotypic resistance against ß‐lactam and the mecA gene presence may be a result of possible unknown resistance genes or it may constitute an intrinsic resistance.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 74%
“…In an Algerian study, erythromycin resistance was much lower (37.8%) than in our study (65%). However, the authors of the Algerian study included S. aureus from food, nosocomial, and community-acquired infections and identified only the ermC gene [6,19]; the fact that we only isolated strains from nosocomial pneumonia, whereas the other studies used different sources, could explain the differences observed. (Strains 7, 8, 10, 11, 12, 14, and 19).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Yilmaz et al identified nine strains of S. aureus with the tetM gene and ten with the tetK gene [20]. Finally, Achek et al detected both the tetK and tetM genes in ten S. aureus isolates from clinical samples [19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…isolated MRSA; they found the nasal carriage of S. aureus to be significantly associated with cancer and previous hospitalization for kidney failure due to immunological suppression and hemodialysis. The MRSA isolates ST239 ( n = 60), ST80 ( n = 27), ST5 ( n = 2), ST22 ( n = 2), and ST535 ( n = 1) harbored mecA . In another study in Algeria, typing of 64 MRSA isolated from human pus ( n = 47), venous catheters ( n = 7), tracheal aspirates ( n = 4), puncture fluids ( n = 3), blood ( n = 2), and urine ( n = 1) in 64 patients found that 50 were hospital‐acquired MRSA (HA‐MRSA) and 14 were community‐acquired MRSA (CA‐MRSA); mecA , mobilized by SCC mec , was the only detected mechanism of resistance.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%