2018
DOI: 10.1039/c7se00236j
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Emerging microalgae technology: a review

Abstract: Cultivating microalgae has the potential to produce biofuels and bioproducts from solar energy with low land use and without competing with food crops.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 389 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In DEP-based cell manipulation and sorting, the movement of polarizable particles, such as cells, in an inhomogeneous electric field is dependent on their intrinsic dielectric properties in comparison to Despite these advances, many challenges still remain [15][16][17]. Identifying and developing strains with higher productivity, improved understanding of their behaviors under diverse cultivation conditions, and better insights into the heterogeneous population are all some of the key advances that have to be made in the upstream process of microalgae biotechnology and bioprocessing [16,[18][19][20][21][22]]. Yet, these development processes are often time-consuming and labor-intensive, posing as a significant bottleneck.…”
Section: Dep Technology For Cell Population Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In DEP-based cell manipulation and sorting, the movement of polarizable particles, such as cells, in an inhomogeneous electric field is dependent on their intrinsic dielectric properties in comparison to Despite these advances, many challenges still remain [15][16][17]. Identifying and developing strains with higher productivity, improved understanding of their behaviors under diverse cultivation conditions, and better insights into the heterogeneous population are all some of the key advances that have to be made in the upstream process of microalgae biotechnology and bioprocessing [16,[18][19][20][21][22]]. Yet, these development processes are often time-consuming and labor-intensive, posing as a significant bottleneck.…”
Section: Dep Technology For Cell Population Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…data) and are currently considered for scale-up. Porous substrate bioreactors (PSBR), in particular of the twin-layer type (Nowack et al 2005), have recently attracted considerable attention as an alternative to low density autotrophic suspension cultures (reviews by Mantzorou and Ververides 2019;Podola et al 2017;Pierobon et al 2018;Zhuang et al 2018). The low energy demands for water circulation, as well as the low water footprint and content of the biomass and associated ease of harvesting and processing of biomass, make these systems attractive for applications in bioremediation, biotechnology and biorefinery processes.…”
Section: Dha Content and Productivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While light, temperature and CO 2 supplies can be easily controlled at laboratory scale, therefore producing best biomass yields, biomass productivities are typically reduced in large volume suspension-based systems, due to light and carbon limitation, particularly in raceway pond cultivation (Pierobon et al, 2018). Under outdoor large-scale cultivation conditions, improved solar and carbon supplies can be achieved in closed bioreactors, but this adds energy and infrastructure costs, limiting suitability to high-value product development (Pierobon et al, 2018). In contrast, cyanobacterial biofilm reactors are better suited for cost-effective biomass production and are frequently used for wastewater treatment (Hoh et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cyanobacterial biofilm cultivation requires minimal water supplies, gas exchange (CO 2 absorption and O 2 venting) is more efficient and harvesting is energy-efficient (Heimann, 2016). Recently developed porous substrate biofilm reactors show efficient light -, carbonand water utilization and scale-up of this technology is easily possible, making them a promising technology for economical microalgal/microbial biomass production (Pierobon et al, 2018). For example, cyanobacterial biomass productivity was greater in rotating biofilm reactors without aeration or additional CO 2supplementation compared to suspension reactors (Gross and Wen, 2014), but the adhesion process for mat establishment is sensitive to shear forces, and species-and substrate-dependent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%