1992
DOI: 10.1016/0308-597x(92)90044-p
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Emerging marine environmental protection strategies for the Arctic

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…117 Iceland in particular voiced its concern that three Members of the Arctic Council were not invited to participate in the meetings. 118 At the meeting in Chelsea, even US Foreign Minister Clinton criticised the exclusive list of participants. 119 114 The respective Agreement was indeed concluded in May 2011, see Arctic Search and Rescue Agreement, available at: http://arctic-council.npolar.no/accms/export/sites/default/en/meetings/ 2011-nuuk-ministerial/docs/Arctic_SAR_Agreement_EN_FINAL_for_signature_21-Apr-2011.…”
Section: Ee) Exclusive Meetings Of the Coastal Statesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…117 Iceland in particular voiced its concern that three Members of the Arctic Council were not invited to participate in the meetings. 118 At the meeting in Chelsea, even US Foreign Minister Clinton criticised the exclusive list of participants. 119 114 The respective Agreement was indeed concluded in May 2011, see Arctic Search and Rescue Agreement, available at: http://arctic-council.npolar.no/accms/export/sites/default/en/meetings/ 2011-nuuk-ministerial/docs/Arctic_SAR_Agreement_EN_FINAL_for_signature_21-Apr-2011.…”
Section: Ee) Exclusive Meetings Of the Coastal Statesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…117 See Arctic Council, Meeting of Senior Arctic Officials, Final Report, 28-29 November 2007, Narvik, Norway. 118 See Arctic Council, Meeting of Senior Arctic Officials, supra note 117, p. 20: "Iceland expressed concerns that separate meetings of the five Arctic states, Denmark, Norway, US, Russia and Canada, on Arctic issues without the participation of the members of the Arctic Council, Sweden, Finland and Iceland, could create a new process that competes with the objectives of the Arctic Council. If issues of broad concern to all of the Arctic Council Member States, including the effect of climate change, shipping in the Arctic, etc.…”
Section: Ee) Exclusive Meetings Of the Coastal Statesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Les recherches sur le transport maritime en Arctique ont reconnu très tôt que l'environnement polaire représente des risques grandement accrus pour les navires commerciaux d'une part et que d'autre part les écosystèmes arctiques sont plus susceptibles d'être affectés par la pollution des navires (LAMSON, 1987 ;ROGINKO, LAMOURIE, 1992). Considérant l'augmentation observée des trafics, ces préoccupations sont d'autant plus d'actualité (ARCTIC COUNCIL, 2009 ; DUPRÉ, 2010b) notamment parce que les hydrocarbures se dégradent plus lentement dans l'environnement polaire et que les méthodes utilisées pour récupérer le pétrole déversé en mer pourraient être impossibles à déployer en présence de glace.…”
Section: Figure 7 : éVolution Des Déchargements En Arctique En Relati...unclassified
“…The strategy focused on new opportunities to address the problems of Arctic pollution. Many of the pollution issues to 33 be addressed tied into testing, transport, storage and decommissioning of nuclear weapons and nuclear-powered vessels, and thus were only possible to address in the radically changed post-Cold War geopolitical climate (Roginko and LaMourie, 1992;Keskitalo, 2004). The AEPS focused on six key pollution issues: (1) acidification in the Arctic; (2) persistent organic pollutants (POPs); (3) oil pollution in the Arctic (from vessels, offshore development); (4) radioactivity in the Arctic; (5) heavy metal pollution through long-range atmospheric transport; and (6) the monitoring and conservation of flora and fauna (Scrivener, 1999;Caron, 1993).…”
Section: Letting the Lines Cross: Actors In Arctic Governance Todaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dodds and Nuttall (2015: 41) coin the term 'legalization' of Arctic space to capture the growing layers of soft and hard law, produced specifically for the Arctic or for global application with important Arctic repercussions. At the end of the Cold War, the only multilateral agreements in place specific to the Arctic were the Svalbard Treaty and the 1973 Polar Bear Convention, which was originally an initiative of the Soviet Union (Roginko and LaMourie, 1992;Young, 1992Young, , 1998. The development and ratification, by most Arctic states, of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) in 1982 was also another key milestone for the legal harmonisation of interests amongst the Arctic coastal states (Harders, 1987).…”
Section: States and Their Representativesmentioning
confidence: 99%