1996
DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.epirev.a017917
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Emerging Infections: Pandemic Influenza

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
288
3
14

Year Published

1998
1998
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 409 publications
(321 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
11
288
3
14
Order By: Relevance
“…The model was validated by comparing its predictions to outcomes seen in the ongoing A(H1N1) pandemic (see electronic supplementary material, figure S15) and by comparing the attack rates by age with those observed during the 1918-1919 Spanish influenza in the Unites States (Glezen 1996) (see electronic supplementary material, figure S16). …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model was validated by comparing its predictions to outcomes seen in the ongoing A(H1N1) pandemic (see electronic supplementary material, figure S15) and by comparing the attack rates by age with those observed during the 1918-1919 Spanish influenza in the Unites States (Glezen 1996) (see electronic supplementary material, figure S16). …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other studies have similarly estimated baseline mortality from weekly or monthly deaths, exclusive of epidemic periods, by using least-squares regression with sinusoidal terms. Although alternatives have been developed (24)(25)(26) and variations on this model have continued to be widely used (27)(28)(29)(30), excess mortality remains an insensitive measure of severity, particularly in pediatric populations (1). We used the same monthly baseline equation with annual and 6-month-cycle terms for total P&I and for total and age-specific all-cause mortality analyses:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though schoolchildren and young adults have not been considered at high risk for complications or death from influenza, annual morbidity is high; illness attack rates in schoolchildren is higher than that of adults. 8 Analysis of influenza activity during the 1918 and 1957 pandemics showed that influenza virus activity increased at the start of the school year and peaked once schools had been in session for ∼2 months. In addition, during the course of an influenza epidemic, the distribution of patients positive for influenza by culture shifted from school-age children to children aged ,5 years plus adults, further explaining why schoolchildren are generally considered to be the most important source of communitywide transmission of influenza.…”
Section: Justification For Immunizing Schoolchildren Annually Againstmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, during the course of an influenza epidemic, the distribution of patients positive for influenza by culture shifted from school-age children to children aged ,5 years plus adults, further explaining why schoolchildren are generally considered to be the most important source of communitywide transmission of influenza. 8 Because the immune systems of children respond better to influenza vaccination than adults, vaccination of schoolchildren could have important indirect effects in reducing morbidity and mortality in older adults. 9 Ecologic evidence for this was shown by a mandatory influenza vaccination program for schoolchildren in Japan during the mid-1970s through the 1980s that reached a vaccination coverage rate of 50% to 85% and was associated with a reduction in influenza disease among older adults and a population-wide reduction in all-cause mortality of 37 000 to 49 000 deaths per year.…”
Section: Justification For Immunizing Schoolchildren Annually Againstmentioning
confidence: 99%