1999
DOI: 10.2307/744016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Emerging from the Margins of Historical Consciousness: Chinese Immigrants and the History of American Law

Abstract: During the past generation legal histories of Chinese immigrants who came to America during the second half of the nineteenth century have reshaped our view of their significance for the history of American law. The preceding three generations of professional legal historians perceived the legal experience of Chinese immigrants as marginal to the history of American law and wrote no histories about it. Those who did write about Chinese immigrants viewed them as the passive and nonassimilating victims of harsh … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 23 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Immigration legislation in 1965 expanded immigration and shifted United States immigration policy in four ways. First, it ended the explicit exclusion of Latinos and Asians found in prior immigration laws (Cole & Chin, 1999; Harris, 1993; Massey, Durand, & Malone, 2002), Second, it ended the explicit preference for Western European immigrants (Johnson, 2009). Third, it opened immigration to highly skilled and professional labor (arguably an implicit exclusion of immigrants of color) (Johnson, 2009).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Immigration legislation in 1965 expanded immigration and shifted United States immigration policy in four ways. First, it ended the explicit exclusion of Latinos and Asians found in prior immigration laws (Cole & Chin, 1999; Harris, 1993; Massey, Durand, & Malone, 2002), Second, it ended the explicit preference for Western European immigrants (Johnson, 2009). Third, it opened immigration to highly skilled and professional labor (arguably an implicit exclusion of immigrants of color) (Johnson, 2009).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%