2001
DOI: 10.1007/s100960000414
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Emerging Erythromycin Resistance Among Group B Streptococci in Korea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

7
25
0
7

Year Published

2003
2003
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
7
25
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Duarte et al (2005) described some resistance to erythromycin (5%) among Ia strains collected between 2000-2001 in Rio de Janeiro. In the present report, susceptibility to other antimicrobial agents is in agreement with other data in the literature (Hsueh et al 2001, Uh et al 2001, Simões et al 2007.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Duarte et al (2005) described some resistance to erythromycin (5%) among Ia strains collected between 2000-2001 in Rio de Janeiro. In the present report, susceptibility to other antimicrobial agents is in agreement with other data in the literature (Hsueh et al 2001, Uh et al 2001, Simões et al 2007.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Variable susceptibilities of GBS to erythromycin and clindamycin (from 4-40%) are described in the literature (Hsueh et al 2001, Uh et al 2001, Díaz et al 2008. Simões et al (2007) did not detect resistance to erythromycin and clindamycin among Ia isolates collected between 2003-2004 in São Paulo.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is in line with previous findings in the Asia, Europe and the United States (Table 1 [ [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19]). In the study by Morozumi et al [2], 7/32 (21·9%) serotype Ia and 24/88 (27·3%) serotype III GBS isolates showed ML resistance.…”
Section: Association Between Capsular Serotype V and Macrolide Resistsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…One hundred and fifty (150) pregnant women participated in the study over a period of six months (May to December 2010). Their age range was 18-42 years with a mean of 30.25 (±4.65) and the age group in years was categorized as younger (18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29) and older (≥30) pregnant women, which were 64 (42.7%) and 86 (57.3%) respectively. Table 1 shows parity and gestational age among other parameters as indicated.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the subjects that were colonized with GBS, GBS colonization was higher among older women with age ≥30 years (12.79%) against 9.38% in younger (18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29) women (Table 3). The difference was not statistically significant (X 2 = 0.426; P= 0.514).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%