2019
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.99.064321
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Emerging collectivity from the nuclear structure of Xe132 : Inelastic neutron scattering studies and shell-model calculations

Abstract: Inelastic neutron scattering was used to study the low-lying nuclear structure of 132 Xe. A comprehensive level scheme is presented, as well as new level lifetimes, multipole mixing ratios, branching ratios, and transition probabilities. Comparisons of these data as well as previously measured E2 strengths and g factors are made with new shell-model calculations for 132,134,136 Xe to explore the emergence of collectivity in the Xe isotopes with N < 82 near the closed shell. *

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
27
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
3
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…E x = 3108.7 keV: The NDS lists a 2 + state at 3109.59 (9) keV. The measured angular distribution for our observed peak corresponding to this state agrees well with a combination of L = 0 and L = 2 transitions.…”
Section: Other Statessupporting
confidence: 75%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…E x = 3108.7 keV: The NDS lists a 2 + state at 3109.59 (9) keV. The measured angular distribution for our observed peak corresponding to this state agrees well with a combination of L = 0 and L = 2 transitions.…”
Section: Other Statessupporting
confidence: 75%
“…E x = 3498.7 keV: There are no reported levels at this energy. The nearest states listed in the NDS are at 3505.5 (9) and 3508.7(3) keV, with J π = 0 (+) , 1, 2, 3 + and J π = (4 + ) respectively [31]. Our measured angular distribution for this level is consistent with both L = 4 and L = 5 transfer.…”
Section: Other Statessupporting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In such cases, the observed transition strengths result from small components of the wavefunction, which can lead to considerable variations in the shell model predictions, despite the calculations agreeing on the dominant structure of the states. It was noted in [32] that the large-basis shell model calculations support the dominant configurations assigned in the (1g 7/2 2d 5/2 ) seniority model up to the 4 + 2 state at 2.1 MeV excitation, although there is considerable configuration mixing. The (1g 7/2 2d 5/2 ) model accounts for all states up to about 2.8 MeV, with the exception of the 0 + 2 state (more on the 0 + 2 state below in this Section).…”
Section: B(e2mentioning
confidence: 71%
“…However, shell model calculations affirm the dominant seniority structures. The case of 136 Xe has been studied comprehensively [30,32]. Table 1 shows experimental B(E2) values between low-excitation states in 136 Xe in comparison to the (1g 7/2 2d 5/2 ) seniority model, as well as several shell model calculations that include all orbits in the 50 ≤ Z ≤ 82 major shell but use alternative interactions.…”
Section: B(e2mentioning
confidence: 99%